Recent content by Arthur Dalvan

Angelo, you'd be a naive fool to fully accept without reserve anything you've not had a chance to evaluate for yourself, but you I will not allow you to attribute words which I never uttered, or concepts I never would expound, to me. I suspect you know quite well that I've never said anyone...

You seem to forget that we heard Stanford's report of what his project has filmed and recorded electronically in an interview. When last I heard, there was supposed to be free speech in the USA, and he was open and honest in saying he has spectacular UFO films and photos. Would he be a better...

Look, Angelo, you appear foolish in implying that analog graphs of UFO-generated changes in acceleration due to gravity and of the extreme low-frequency magnetic fields emanating from the objects Stanford and his fellow lab crew members recorded (in case you didn't bother to read the captions)...

Defining the unknown by the undefined (such as calling it demonic) is only playing the age-old hate and/or fear game, a beloved pastime of 'born-againers', 'the saved', 'Have you accepted Jesus as your Personal Savior' people, 'washed in The Blooders'. and the rest of Christian fundamentalists...

Ola, stphrz, First tell me how to pronounce THAT. :) You don't seem to realize that when I'm informing anyone of something, that's not the same as asking that person to believe it. I might state something enthusiastically, but that's certainly not telling anyone they must believe it. As I...

You try to put words into my mouth, but don't succeed. I was not asking "Angel" to accept anything, but advising him to keep away from prejudging what he has not seen to prevent a red face later. I actually met a couple of Ph.D.s who've seen a bunch of the film evidence in possession of...

"Angel", Please accept my apology for not noticing your name. I'm new to this forum and am still blurry-eyed (a mind state, actually) and can hardly find anything. O.K., but you will likely still be embarrassed for putting down the guy. Proof, of course, is in the mind of the beholder, much...

He is not pretending anything. At top left it says it's a "simulation". You call yourself "Angel", but smile with a dagger behind your back! Go ahead with your daydreams that Stanford doesn't have the evidence he has, but I saw what was surely some of the best of it presented to a large group...

You're being impertinent. It's clear you know nothing substantial about Ray Stanford's instrumented UFO monitoring work with which to try and put him down, so you grasp the straw of Bingham. It's reasonable to think that Stanford deliberately gave the location relative to landmarks by which many...

Please explain the basis on which you call it a priceless comedy. Arthur Dalvan