NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, 11 years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
My smart TV has wireless capability — but I plugged it into my wired network and shut off the wi-fi.
@Randall Will you be starting up a new thread? I would love to have an open discussion about the vaccine being a 'kill-shot'.
I wish I felt safe to do so — but don't. The lift of the ban on the Forbidden Topic isn't an acknowledgement that vax mandates are unethical, or that vaccine injuries and deaths are real, or that lockdowns ruined many peoples lives, or that medical censorship and discrimination cost people their lives, or that there's no direct evidence that anyone was actually "saved" by the vax, or that many deaths from COVID were fabricated — etc, ect, ect. However, quite a few other people have woken-up and made things right — so who knows? Stranger things have happened.
Ivermectin was the first story that went full blown MSM propaganda with the, "You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it." campaign. It was obvious propaganda, and it took me less than 20 mins to fact-check the fact-checkers and debunk the MSM BS.
Ivermectin has proven medicinal benefits for a number of health issues. However, I try to caution my freedom friends that it is still a drug — not a nutritional supplement, and that unless they know for sure that they have some health problem as confirmed by medical professionals via lab tests, that it's probably better to stick with good nutrition and exercise as primary prevention.
Yep — I mentioned that above as well. Personally, given what I've learned over the last six years, I wouldn't take or reccommend a vax to anyone. I might however, under certain circustances, agree that as a form of gene therapy, there is evidence that mRNA can be helpful in treating certain cancers.
How do you know the ban has been lifted then? If you still feel unsafe how then can the ban have been lifted?
Gene said so, and since then, I've posted Forbidden Topic content in the open forum, and had a back & forth or two with Gene. Just taking it slow.
Good question. I'd say that the feeling has to do being inflicted with a sort of pavlovian tick from repeated punishment
Your words of encouragement fill my heart with joy
They're not only going to do it again — they're drawing their plans now.
You mean the guy who lied about his credentials in interviews over and over again and is now being sued for it? This is also someone who has discredited himself because of his unscientific beliefs, which have been debunked repeatedly, and has had various certifications removed from him by medical and scientific bodies he was formerly affiliated with.
You still don't see an ongoing theme in this debate do you? So many various institutions and recognized bodies stand against the anti-vaxxer movement. So many point out issues and problems and a lack of proper medical evidence or scientific articles confirming your points except from the Wellness company - who are busy selling supplements to replace vaccinations. You don't see a problem here?Using smear campaingers instead of addressing the evidence is not valid counterpoint.
Besides that:
McCullough never "lied". His professional credentials are valid. He simply used his past experience as part of his background — to which Baylor objected and sued ( and lost ). The case was ultimately dismissed with prejudice in January 2023.
Surely you can do better than that?
Also, the "Wellness Company" Editorial Team is supported by registered nurses, epidemiology specialists, and experienced medical researchers. who draw on validated, evidence-based sources to ensure accuracy, making it a source for high quality products and information. It is part of the Health Freedom Movement ( not a "cabal" ). They might even be able to help @Gene Steinberg with some of his ailments.
If there's any "cabal", it's big pharma — known to collude with each other, the MSM, educational institutions, regulators, and government officials across the globe, in pushing their toxic poison on everyone — by mandate if necessary !
So thanks for confirming which side of those barricades you're on. At first I just thought you'd been innocently influenced by the MSM propganda, and just needed to dig a little deeper. Now it's clear you're just with "them" — and to think that Gene thinks I've been swayed to the "dark side"
And those "institutions" and "bodies" have been captured by big pharma.
And many onf those articles are garbage and/or have been retracted.
So what? The attacks on McCullogh and other medical professionals fighting for truth and freedom against a corupt bureaucracy are the ones I'm rooting for — too bad you haven't seen the light. Besides — As I already said, McCullough won against the smear campaign against him — yet you still parrot the loser. Why?
Mostly — yes. Big pharma influence and conflict of interest is well documented — but you'd actually have to read the exposés like the free one I posted ( and several others ) to understand it. Of course you already know this — right? So why this discussion?
In large part yes — as evidenced by their cooperation on invoking vaxports to track and deprive unvaxxed of their right to freely travel. Governments are definitely in collusion with big pharma ( and the MSM ), paying billions ( trillions worldwide ) to them. But again — you already know that too. So why try to deny it?
The stats have been self-servingly massaged in favor of efficacy — while the side effects have been self-servingly spun the other way. The "overwhelming evidence" clearly shows this ( as evidenced in previous posts including the ARR vs RRR video ).
The entire planet isn't "in on it" — many of us saw the problems early on, and since then many have woken-up. You're either the exception, or perhaps invested in vax company shares — or just can't handle the truth because you're on booster 12 and are so invested in you're faith in vaccines that you're too biased to accept that vax injuries and deaths are real.
That is to be expected — you have to learn to fact check the fact checkers, learn some basic logical fallcies e.g. ad hominem, strawman, appeals to authority etc. Yes — there is a fringe element ( on both sides of the barricades ) that go too far with their claims. However, even they often have fair points. It's niot an easy task to sift through it all — but I've done a lot of sifting — and I know how to separate the signal from the noise.
That's what those on the pro-vax side say — while smearing world call cardiologists like McCullough who say exactly the opposite — with evidence instead of name calling and dismissals. Actually have a look at his papers and work — watch some of his lectures and presentations — see for yourself instead of relying of character assinations.
www.sirillp.com
That would be the right thing to do.
A mix.
That amounts to wilful ignorance and denial.
Those examples are not as airtight as you claim. The polio vax, was introduced at the end of the polio wave, claimed success for having stopped it, and then killed a bunch of people, while today, the major cause of polio in Africa came from bad vaccines.
Now there's compelling evidence that SIDS ( Sudden Infant Death Syndrome ) is caused by infant vaccination.
pierrekorymedicalmusings.com
There are other factors besides vaccines in play there. I'd include more details, but you don't seem to care about that.
And yet Randall has tried to convince me over and over that somehow it's my logic that is faulty. I've been really firm with Randall in the past about how I'm not even interested in his anti-vaxxer stance. Despite this, he would repeatedly try to change my mind with his woo-woo antivaxxer crap, and yet, I'm still the one who is deluded in my thinking.
Uh, actually, I sit with the majority of good scientific history on planet earth and join in with the majority of people on planet earth who enjoy the use of vaccines in order to increase their life spans. That's why childhood vaccines are necessities and how we have eliminated most diseases including polio (a point which I already disputed previously regarding your ridiculous graph that pretends to acknowledge the true medical history of that disease, our ability to detect it and prevent it along with the use of the vaccine. It's total B.S. this junk you post pretending to be real.math and real.medical history).
Thank you so much for being a voice of sanity in this discussion. I go bonkers over conspiracy theories that endanger the lives, freedoms and vitality of human beings. I find promoting this kind of ignorance to be despicable.Burnt State, you are far braver and more patient person than I. I'll just pop in to note that I've got family members whose mother INSISTED they get vaccinated when the vaccines first became widely available. Their mother knew a time in which children and babies died. These same family members are now kicking ass in their '80s. I would encourage everyone to start digging back into their family history because a lot of children died of diseases that can now be prevented through vaccine, modern plumbing, or treated with antibiotics. Also, I had a family member who died of tetanus infection. It's a painful way to die and I wouldn't wish it on anyone. Smallpox has been eradicated. And yet Randall has tried to convince me over and over that somehow it's my logic that is faulty. I've been really firm with Randall in the past about how I'm not even interested in his anti-vaxxer stance. Despite this, he would repeatedly try to change my mind with his woo-woo antivaxxer crap, and yet, I'm still the one who is deluded in my thinking.
