• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Your Paracast Newsletter — August 24, 2014

Forums New posts
Legitimacy should be the most important aspect of the research. If you skip that part, what's the point of looking into it in the first place? How many times have we seen cases where researchers just blatantly ignore that step, and when you point it out people get immediately branded as a "debunker"? It's not even that the person might be lying, but research has shown over and over again that no, you do NOT in fact know what you see.

How can you even start to theorize about motives when you have no idea what did or didn't happen?

It all boils down to my signature, really. ;)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top