Heard the show Don,
and let me say i just don't get it.
What was the burning information that Paul Kimball had to share with the world?
That Kevin Randall was having doubts about the authenticity of the current research going on with the dream team?
Kevin and Paul are both well known researchers in the field. I am sure researches discuss all sorts of things with each other away from the public eye.
Why would Paul go and throw away all the trust he built up in the research community?
Now no one with trust Paul now with holding information in confidence.
I just don't understand what was so vital to share with the public that Paul had to become a "whistle blower"
Paul, believes Randle was lying when he said he never investigated the slides. Paul uses the private email send to him from Randle to back up his assertions.
Taken from the email i read on Paul Kimball's blog. My view not Paul's here. Randle, is trying to find out what's the story is with those slides.
I’m not sure what the purpose of the Midland trip was, but all it did was put the information out for others to find, including Nick Redfern. I’ve talked to Nick about this. Here’s where the train slips off the rails. I have learned that the man with the photographs is not the man who took them. The man with them got them from his sister who was cleaning out an attic in Sedona, Arizona but the sister was helping her boyfriend in the cleaning who worked for an estate service. (Convoluted enough for you?) The slides were found in a box in a separate envelop taped to an inner box lid, away from other slides. The box apparently belonged to the second wife of the photographer… the other slides in the box contained pictures from that “era” including one of Eisenhower (which is obviously five years too late).
...........
The next bit of information after that is why Paul felt he needed to release the email to the public.
Neither Schmitt nor Carey told me the photographer’s name or the name of the man who allegedly took the pictures (though given the chain of custody, I’m not sure who might have taken the pictures but I had a name of the man who died decades ago and I know the name of the man who allegedly took them), but I have been able to learn all that, and found a telephone number of the man who lives in Chicago. I’m sure that I don’t have to tell you the problem with these slides… oh, and the man who has them now and who has approached a number of media outlets attempting to sell them, is a graphic artist.
You can take from that Randle did indeed privately investigate the slides.
..........
Randle, made comments to a columnist Clueless Wonder. Again here. Paul felt Rande was not been truthful!
"I have seen no photographs, slides, or pictures of alien creatures associated with the Roswell crash," Randle explained. "I have participated in no investigations of such slides."
Paul Kimball also has an issue with Anthony Bragalia ( a member of the Roswell Dream team)
Kimball learned from an unnamed source, , Tom Carey and Don Schmitt were investigating the claims of the slides. So Kimball had information about the slides before it became public knowledge.
From Paul Kimball's blog.
There has been, for several months now, speculation at the
UFO Iconoclasts blog about rumoured "new evidence" that could break the Roswell case wide open. Some of the statements have come from Rich Reynolds, the man who runs the blog - others have come from various commenters at the blog, including Anthony Bragalia, one of the members of the self-proclaimed "Dream Team" that came together ostensibly to examine the Roswell case with a fresh outlook.
Anthony Bragalia responded not sure when to the rumoured new evidence been talked about on that site.
Mr. Bragalia responded at the UFO Iconoclasts blog as follows:
Folks... bogus information from Richard Reynolds... and from anonymous. He is threading a tale to create whole cloth... but there are too many holes in Mr. Reynolds tale.
Paul Kimball then asked Bragalia was the rumoured information about the slides true. This was his response it wasn't polite or nice.
"Paul Kimball you must be kidding. I owe you nothing. Come to Jesus? How about go to hell?"
So Paul again felt he had to release the email. Paul issue with Don Schmitt is he's a liar. He lied about his education, work in the past. So why trust him?
