• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

What Happened On the Moon? - An Investigation Into Apollo

Charlie Prime

Paranormal Adept
This DVD set made me angry. Although I am a seasoned political conspiracy theorist, I thought the Apollo faked photo theories were a bunch of nonsense only retards believed.

On a whim I downloaded this 2 DVD set and watched them yesterday. I wish I had not. My Mom decorated my birthday cake for my 7th birthday party with a Saturn 5 rocket. I'm growing weary of discovering how many things I used to believe are not true.

How to watch:

* Install DownloadHelper - Media download Firefox extension

* Download theses videos to your computer as .mp4 files.

* Copy them to your Home Theater PC or cell phone or whatever.

Note: To get DownloadHelper to download these videos as .mp4, you must open these YouTube videos in their own tab. To do that, click on the video where it says "YouTube", like this...

openyoutube-1.jpg


You can buy these here: What Happened On The Moon?: Hoax, Lies & Video Tape - Special Expanded Edition - 2DVD Disk Set : UFOTV


DVD 1

DVD 2
 
Last edited:
The hole in this conspiracy is Parkes.

Rent "The Dish" to get an idea

These guys were very proud of the role they played, there is no way they wouldnt have known the signals they were getting were not coming from the moon.

Walk into the Parkes Hotel at happy hour and loudly announce the the guys manning the dish were in on the lie.......

You'd be safer crashing a sex pistols concert in a tinky winky costume.

The aussies pulled a swifty on the US during this as well, the deal was that the signal would go to the US first, and they would then send it out worldwide.

Some larakin at the ABC in paddington, made a "mistake" and we got the live feed straight up raw before the US did.

You paid for it, we saw it before you did, caused quite a stink at the time.

But the fact is the signal came from the moon to parkes to paddington to Australian TVs before it got to the US, if there had been any conspiracy the techs at Parkes would have had to have been in on it, and knowing aussies like i do thats just not possible

The moon landing: fact & fiction | SBS News

Tall poppy syndrome is ingrained in them from an early age

Tall poppy syndrome - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


If the Seppos had been faking it, they would have ratted you out to the rest of the world with glee

The "fair Dinkum" factor puts the consipracy to rest imo
 
Well the old saying--when what you have is a hammer, everything starts to look like a nail. Some conspiracies are real and some grow larger over time as mythology. I really think we went. Esoteric aspects of Apollo to which we are not privy would seem more likely.
 
i think they went aswell, but i dont believe they landed not for one second.

for me, it's the weight against the thrust and speed capability of the saturn 5 rocket.


Dr Stanislav Georgievich Pokrovsky (b. 1959)[191] is a Russian candidate of technical sciences and General Director of the scientific-manufacturing enterprise "Project-D-MSK".[192]

In 2007, he studied the filmed staging of the first stage (S-IC) of the Saturn V rocket after the launch of Apollo 11.[193] Analysing it frame by frame, he calculated the actual speed of the Saturn V rocket at S-IC staging time using four different, independent and mutually verifying methods. With all of them, the calculated speed turned out to be at maximum half (1.2 km/s) of the declared one at that point (2.4 km/s). He concluded that due to this, no more than 28 t could be brought on the way to the Moon, including the spacecraft, instead of the 46 t declared by NASA, and so a loop around the Moon was possible but not a manned landing on the Moon with return to the Earth.[194][195][196][197]

In 2008, Pokrovsky also claimed to have determined the reason why a higher speed was impossible—problems with the Inconel X-750 superalloy used for the tubes of the wall of the thrust chamber of the F-1 engine,[198] whose physics of high-temperature strength was not yet studied at that time. The strength of the material changes when affected by high temperature and plastic deformations. As a result, the F-1 engine thrust had to be lowered by at least 20%. With these assumptions, he calculated that the real speed would be the same as he had already estimated (see above). Pokrovsky proved that six or more F-1 engines (instead of five) could not be used due to the increased fuel mass required by each new engine, which in turn would require more engines, and so on.[196][197][199][200]

Pokrovsky claims that his Saturn V speed estimation is the "first direct proof of the impossibility of the Apollo Moon landing".[192] He says that fifteen specialists with scientific degrees (e.g. Alexander Budnik)[201] who reviewed his paper, of which at least five aerodynamics experts and three narrow specialists in ultrasonic movement and aerosols, raised no objections in principle, and the specific wishes and notes they (e.g. Vladimir Surdin)[202] did have could not change his results significantly even if followed.[203][204] Pokrovsky compares his own frame-by-frame analysis of the filmed Saturn V flight to the frame-by-frame analysis of the filmed Trinity nuclear test (1945) done by the Soviet academician Leonid Sedov who created his own blast wave theory to estimate the then top secret power of the explosion.[205]

See also author's note below.[206] Pokrovsky's findings about the rocket speed were later confirmed by Alexander Reshnyak and Alexander Popov (see below) and his smoke lag method proven to be valid.[207]

Alexander Popov
Dr Alexander Ivanovich Popov (b. 1943) is a Russian senior research associate, doctor of physical-mathematical sciences, and author of more than 100 scientific works and inventions in the fields of laser optics and spectroscopy.[208]

Helped by more than forty volunteers, most of which with scientific degrees,[209] he wrote the book "Americans on the Moon" (2009).[210][211] In it, Popov placed the burden of proof on NASA,[209] and denied all Moon landing evidence, dividing it to five groups:

  1. Visual (photo, film and video) material that can successfully be made on Earth, in cinema studios.
  2. Obvious counterfeits and fakes, when visual material from ordinary space flights on Earth orbit is presented as Moon material.
  3. Space photos, attributed to the astronauts but which by that time could already be made and were made by space robots, including American ones.
  4. Devices on Moon (e.g., light reflectors)—by that time both American and Soviet automatic "messengers" had sent on Moon several tens of similar devices.
  5. Unfounded, unprovable claims, e.g., for about 400 kg of soil, overwhelming part of which NASA keeps safe and gives only grams for checking.
Thus he concluded that the NASA claims on Moon landings are left unproven, and pursuant to science rules, in the absence of trustworthy evidence, the event, in this case the American Moon landings and their loops around the Moon, cannot be considered real, that is, having taken place.[13] He also confirmed Pokrovsky's results for the speed of the Saturn V at S-IC staging time (see above).[212][213] Popov accused the Politburo of the CPSU Central Committee of trading the 1970s Détente for covering up the US Moon hoax and stopping the Soviet Moon programme.[214]

Yuri Mukhin
Yuri Ignatievich Mukhin (b. 1949), Russian opposition politician, publicist, writer, engineer, metallurgist, manager, and inventor. Author of the books "The Moon affair of the USA" (2006)[215] and "A Moon affair" (2009),[84] and the film "Maximum lies and nonsense" (2010).[216] In his works, he examines the differences between the Soviet and US lunar soil found out by Western researchers, refutes the NASA defenders' arguments, and accuses the US government for plundering the taxpayers' money for the Moon programme. Mukhin states that the Politburo of the CPSU Central Committee was blackmailed by the USA that if the USSR denounces the Moon hoax, the US will denounce the Soviet partocracy before his people, revealing that Khrushchev had killed Stalin and Beria


Moon Landings Hoax - WikiSpooks
 
Does all this thinking and estimations of us not landing on the moon also conincide with Kubrick as responsible for faking all the moon footage as supposedly evidenced in The Shining?
hqdefault.jpg
 
Last edited:
Does all this thinking and estimations of us not landing on the moon also conincide with Kubrick as responsible for faking all the moon footage as supposedly evidenced in The Shining?
hqdefault.jpg

I ran across a video the other day about the incredible wealth of visual symbology in "The Shining". Very interesting and darned if I can recall where I saw it.
 
There's an easy test for this.

Go to your local university observatory and help them point a laser at one of the lunar laser ranging experiment sites.

They're still there. You can see the return. I've done it.

Lunar Laser Ranging experiment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


the Russian reflectors are still there Marduk, the russians have more reflectors on the moon than the yank's.

how many times have the russians claimed to have landed on the moon ?.
 
the Russian reflectors are still there Marduk, the russians have more reflectors on the moon than the yank's.

how many times have the russians claimed to have landed on the moon ?.
Sure. But why would the ruskies put reflectors at sites they yanks said that they put down?

You can aim lasers right at the sites and see the return...
 
Sure NASA pictures, of the NASA site's.

i can produce picture's of the unicorn that lives in my back garden.

theres loads of powerful telescope's now, and other countries robotic craft, photographing the moon left right and centre, show us a non-NASA produced confirmation
 
Back
Top