I was enjoying the interview until he got to the pyramids. His ideas about their construction are woefully out of date, though it does match those of most of the mainstream egyptologist. But it has major issues. Let's forget Baalbek for a moment. He says we know who build them, and how long it took, etc. Well we don't know who built it. It's said to have been built by Pharaoh Khufu, but the only evidence for this was some writing which is thought to have been hoaxed by Colonel Howard Vyse. There is no written record of Khufu building the pyramid, though there is a record of him making mention of it already being there.
Here's the problem with the many workers pulling stones; there's an estimated 2.3 million limestone blocks used in its construction. Egyptologist John Romer estimates it took 14 years to build, using 20,000 workers. To place 2.3 million stones in 14 years, you would have to move 164,286 stones per year. That's 450 stones per day. Assuming they were working 12 hour days, that's 37.5 stones per hour. Or one stone every two minutes. Really?
Plus it doesn't explain how they were moved. One of the latest ideas is a long ramp, but that would need more material in it than in the pyramid itself. Another thing he said was that the stones were not dressed until they arrived at the site, but this is not true. We have all seen the Stone of the Pregnant Woman and other large monolithic stones, which are perfectly cut and dressed, and impossible to move with todays technology.
I'm not saying it was ET, but clearly who ever built it had far greater technology than we give them credit for. Copper tools and 20,000 men couldn't have done it.
Mr. Lamont was also ignorant of the discoveries of batteries and what appears to be light bulbs, since he said where's the wire and batteries. Not that much in the way of copper wire would be intact in all that time, but they did find some.
It's a shame that a person's belief system would stop them from pondering some of the more interesting mysteries in the world.