Tyger
Paranormal Adept
I don't have time for this but here I go. It is for this reason that interacting with you is fruitless.
You have to understand what the definition of climate is. Do you? It's defined in the link. Did you read it? Had you, you would have your answer as to 'how'.
However....answering your request.....
It doesn't work that way and I am going to assume that you know that. It's actually an ignorant request but I suspect you understand that asking the question sounds like a 'gotcha' - when in actual fact you simply show off your abysmal understanding of climate theory. It's what the denialists depend on - this kind of simplistic nonsense.
Got it. Though why not then go onto one of the numerous climate debate threads? Why insist on posting where I am active?
I'll let readers unravel your knotted thinking.Common ground comes with common sense.
Let’s Call It: 30 Years Of Above Average Means The Climate Has Changed. More sophistry no matter who is making claims based on it, most sophistical articles or debate starts with a first sentence false assumption, then make more false assumption based on it, that leads to the erroneous conclusions you seem to crave, as the post above.
Please read the links supplied on the various threads to get this knot unravelled in your thinking.Global average surface temperatures for the last 30yrs have grown at 0.06c av per decade, 0.18c in 30yrs, not even one 20th of a degree, and stalled in any rise for the last 18yrs and theres nothing unusual about it.And the base data for the period was corrupted upwards by giss to start with, before they base their honest modelling science on it.
I'm sorry, you don't know this stuff. It appears you don't understand what average means - you don't understand that there are 3 areas that impact that average. Evidence of this is your continual reference to surface temperature.So you see the articles are see thru to me, as i know this stuff
Conspiracy theorist carry on.and it doesnt bother me the sun doing its thing, or politicians and journalists doing their ''thing''on some huge american social engineering experiment they will dismally fail to implement on a world wide basis. You seem to think volume equals validity.
Who are you talking to? Who do you suppose will answer your entreaty?Let’s Call It: 30 Years Of Above Average Temperatures Means The Climate Has Changed
See how easy sophistry flows.
Has it ? How?
You have to understand what the definition of climate is. Do you? It's defined in the link. Did you read it? Had you, you would have your answer as to 'how'.
Who are you talking to? You want peer reviewed papers but you have said you are not talking to me. Can't have it both ways.Please provide peer reviewed papers/proof to show any weather that has been attributed to any co2, never mind manmade co2.
However....answering your request.....
It doesn't work that way and I am going to assume that you know that. It's actually an ignorant request but I suspect you understand that asking the question sounds like a 'gotcha' - when in actual fact you simply show off your abysmal understanding of climate theory. It's what the denialists depend on - this kind of simplistic nonsense.
Do some research on the differences between climate and weather.Any climatic changes in the last 30yrs have been natural, i will wager by sophistical logic that i will have to ''prove'' the weather was natural.
Last edited: