universeseeker
Skilled Investigator
NASA Found amazing dome. Who is on Mars ?
-
NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
NASA Found amazing dome. Who is on Mars ?
- Thread starter universeseeker
- Start date
Free episodes:
>
Waller
Paranormal Maven
As our scientists to some degree have figured out - the Earth was the product of a collision between a large body that existed in this orbit and another large body that then allowed there to be the creation of the Earth and the Moon. Now, the Moon has been tinkered with since then by other beings for the purpose of balancing the energy of the earth out in a variety of ways, but that’s another story.
In terms of the incarnational procession through our solar system, first there was Maldek in what we now know to be the asteroid belt. There were incarnations of a different type that took place on that world for the idea of soul incarnations to experience certain things and experiences of polarity. There was great destruction in that experience and that world no longer exists.
Thus the incarnations moved inward toward the Sun to the next planet we know as Mars, when it was capable of holding life forms. But then there was a glancing pass-by of a large asteroid that ripped the atmosphere away and turned it into the Mars world we now know it to be.
The incarnations then came to be on the Earth and if Mars were inhabitable by humanoid or other major life forms, we would have evolved there.
Now? No one is on Mars.
In terms of the incarnational procession through our solar system, first there was Maldek in what we now know to be the asteroid belt. There were incarnations of a different type that took place on that world for the idea of soul incarnations to experience certain things and experiences of polarity. There was great destruction in that experience and that world no longer exists.
Thus the incarnations moved inward toward the Sun to the next planet we know as Mars, when it was capable of holding life forms. But then there was a glancing pass-by of a large asteroid that ripped the atmosphere away and turned it into the Mars world we now know it to be.
The incarnations then came to be on the Earth and if Mars were inhabitable by humanoid or other major life forms, we would have evolved there.
Now? No one is on Mars.
Last edited:
stonehart
Paranormal Adept
Please link to the original NASA/JPL image in high res so we may check this ourselves
universeseeker
Skilled Investigator
The atmosphere on Mars wasn't ripped away by an asteroid though... NASA assumed that it was ripped away by a major solar storm. Still , my opinion is that life did evolved on Mars, but when the planet died , they came to earth.. All great civilizations of the past wrote about how the gods descended from heaven, I just don't think it were gods.. I think it was an advanced civilization. Why would the krsna make all those drawnings from flying vehicles ? , But that's just my opinion of course.
universeseeker
Skilled Investigator
stonehart
Paranormal Adept
Thanks, with threads like this it is always best to post more than one source and make sure to back things up or it will be dismissed out of hand as just more junk.
The problem is there has been so much fake shit and misinterpretation of image artifacts that most just ignore this kind of thing these days.
Going to take a look at this myself... could be this is real.. or it could just be a case of an image artifact or the brain filling in blanks.
The problem is there has been so much fake shit and misinterpretation of image artifacts that most just ignore this kind of thing these days.
Going to take a look at this myself... could be this is real.. or it could just be a case of an image artifact or the brain filling in blanks.
Tyger
Paranormal Adept
http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/4073/1P489773398EFFCNK6P2413R1M1.JPG
The above link brings one to a picture, that is all. One needs the entire stream of stills/video to make an assessment.
This much of the above link gets one into the website: http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery However, from that point on, it is unclear to me where to go. If one includes the 'all' in the address nothing comes up. If one pastes this much: http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/4073 one gets a '404 Not Found NoSuchKey'.
As best as I can make out this is a picture (with a JPG) that has been given a 'name' (the 'name' being the entire - http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/4073/1P489773398EFFCNK6P2413R1M1) that includes part of a real NASA website (up to 'gallery' bolded) - after that it doesn't compute. Made up?
If you could please link to where this picture is found in the NASA website, that would be helpful.
The above link brings one to a picture, that is all. One needs the entire stream of stills/video to make an assessment.
This much of the above link gets one into the website: http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery However, from that point on, it is unclear to me where to go. If one includes the 'all' in the address nothing comes up. If one pastes this much: http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/4073 one gets a '404 Not Found NoSuchKey'.
As best as I can make out this is a picture (with a JPG) that has been given a 'name' (the 'name' being the entire - http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/4073/1P489773398EFFCNK6P2413R1M1) that includes part of a real NASA website (up to 'gallery' bolded) - after that it doesn't compute. Made up?
If you could please link to where this picture is found in the NASA website, that would be helpful.
universeseeker
Skilled Investigator
The Original images can be found in The oppertunity raw Images. Sol 4073 (Panoramic Camera)
Here is the Link :
Mars Exploration Rover
Tyger
Paranormal Adept
BTW - just to say - this one is pretty darn fun. 
You've done some enhancing, correct?
First off, what you are identifying as a 'light' is actually a white fleck that the entire picture is riddled with. I don't know what the flecks are but they are unvarying in their shape and direction all over the photograph: all vertical, 'short' and thin. Must have something to do with the picture itself, not what was photographed. Prosaically, they look like 'scratches' on the 'film'.
Once in the link, click on the area of the picture with the 'dome' and it will enlarge -
LINK: http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/4073/1P489773398EFFCNK6P2413R1M1.JPG
I see an outcropping of rock that 'becomes' dome-like. In your video the enlargements do not appear to be the outcropping. Have you done some enhancing? I don't see a demarcation between the below rock and the above rock in the NASA pix as you have in your 'enlargements'. I should be able to see that demarcation in the NASA enlargement detail imo. One doesn't. One cannot 'enlarge' detail that isn't there to begin with.
The area with the claimed 'light' appears to show something that is not there in the original - click to enlarge -
http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/4073/1P489773398EFFCNK6P2413L7M1.JPG
http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/4073/1P489773398EFFCNK6P2413R1M1.JPG
I'm going to show this to someone. I'm convinced you've done some enhancing.
Plus there are pictures taken from altitude - this should show up on those pictures. Do you have that cross reference?
You've done some enhancing, correct?First off, what you are identifying as a 'light' is actually a white fleck that the entire picture is riddled with. I don't know what the flecks are but they are unvarying in their shape and direction all over the photograph: all vertical, 'short' and thin. Must have something to do with the picture itself, not what was photographed. Prosaically, they look like 'scratches' on the 'film'.
Once in the link, click on the area of the picture with the 'dome' and it will enlarge -
LINK: http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/4073/1P489773398EFFCNK6P2413R1M1.JPG
I see an outcropping of rock that 'becomes' dome-like. In your video the enlargements do not appear to be the outcropping. Have you done some enhancing? I don't see a demarcation between the below rock and the above rock in the NASA pix as you have in your 'enlargements'. I should be able to see that demarcation in the NASA enlargement detail imo. One doesn't. One cannot 'enlarge' detail that isn't there to begin with.
The area with the claimed 'light' appears to show something that is not there in the original - click to enlarge -
http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/4073/1P489773398EFFCNK6P2413L7M1.JPG
http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/4073/1P489773398EFFCNK6P2413R1M1.JPG
I'm going to show this to someone. I'm convinced you've done some enhancing.
Plus there are pictures taken from altitude - this should show up on those pictures. Do you have that cross reference?
universeseeker
Skilled Investigator
BTW - just to say - this one is pretty darn fun.
First off, what you are identifying as a 'light' is actually a white fleck that the entire picture is riddled with. I don't know what the flecks are but they are unvarying in their shape and direction all over the photograph: all vertical, 'short' and thin. Must have something to do with the picture itself, not what was photographed. Prosaically, they look like 'scratches' on the 'film'.
Once in the link, click on the area of the picture with the 'dome' and it will enlarge -
LINK: http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/4073/1P489773398EFFCNK6P2413R1M1.JPG
I see an outcropping of rock that 'becomes' dome-like. In your video the enlargements do not appear to be the outcropping. Have you done some enhancing? I don't see a demarcation between the below rock and the above rock in the NASA pix as you have in your 'enlargements'. I should be able to see that demarcation in the NASA enlargement detail imo. One doesn't. One cannot 'enlarge' detail that isn't there to begin with.
The area with the claimed 'light' appears to show something that is not there in the original - click to enlarge -
http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/4073/1P489773398EFFCNK6P2413L7M1.JPG
http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/4073/1P489773398EFFCNK6P2413R1M1.JPG
I'm going to show this to someone. I'm convinced you've done some enhancing.
Plus there are pictures taken from altitude - this should show up on those pictures. Do you have that cross reference?
You gave me the exact same link that I gave you lol.... And pictures taken from altitude ? These are the only two pictures I could find with this "dome shaped object) in it. And did I do some enhancing ? .. Of course I did ... anyone can see that lol .. I didn't enhanced the Original image in the video though .. But you say that you see "A rock that turns into a dome" , could be .. but then why doesn't the other (smaller) rocks turn into more rounded objects after the enhancement ? It seems like it's only the big dome shaped rock that looks like a dome though ...
stonehart
Paranormal Adept
BTW - just to say - this one is pretty darn fun.
First off, what you are identifying as a 'light' is actually a white fleck that the entire picture is riddled with. I don't know what the flecks are but they are unvarying in their shape and direction all over the photograph: all vertical, 'short' and thin. Must have something to do with the picture itself, not what was photographed. Prosaically, they look like 'scratches' on the 'film'.
Once in the link, click on the area of the picture with the 'dome' and it will enlarge -
LINK: http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/4073/1P489773398EFFCNK6P2413R1M1.JPG
I see an outcropping of rock that 'becomes' dome-like. In your video the enlargements do not appear to be the outcropping. Have you done some enhancing? I don't see a demarcation between the below rock and the above rock in the NASA pix as you have in your 'enlargements'. I should be able to see that demarcation in the NASA enlargement detail imo. One doesn't. One cannot 'enlarge' detail that isn't there to begin with.
The area with the claimed 'light' appears to show something that is not there in the original - click to enlarge -
http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/4073/1P489773398EFFCNK6P2413L7M1.JPG
http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/4073/1P489773398EFFCNK6P2413R1M1.JPG
I'm going to show this to someone. I'm convinced you've done some enhancing.
Plus there are pictures taken from altitude - this should show up on those pictures. Do you have that cross reference?
Nice ... just looking at this myself now.
Could be scratches for sure or radiation as this will affect an image if I am not mistaken.
Agreed I feel this is the case as well.
boomerang
Paranormal Adept
Even if we do not find evidence of intelligently crafted artifacts on Mars, strange symmetries produced by "natural" processes there would be reason enough to explore in further detail !
Image enhancement is valid and not out of bounds if done correctly. The trick is in extracting and enhancing real information contained in an original matrix of pixels without creating artifact, or false detail.
There is often a a very fine line between valid and false results. Only a trained expert in image processing should be trusted before pronouncing something to be real. And even then, chain of evidence and random factors can be issues.
For instance--what was the format of the original frame (JPEG, TIFF and about a zillion more possibles)? Was the data compressed or uncompressed ? This can quickly become complex.
Image enhancement is valid and not out of bounds if done correctly. The trick is in extracting and enhancing real information contained in an original matrix of pixels without creating artifact, or false detail.
There is often a a very fine line between valid and false results. Only a trained expert in image processing should be trusted before pronouncing something to be real. And even then, chain of evidence and random factors can be issues.
For instance--what was the format of the original frame (JPEG, TIFF and about a zillion more possibles)? Was the data compressed or uncompressed ? This can quickly become complex.
Tyger
Paranormal Adept
No explanation. What you initially posted came up as I stated. We can laugh together.
Anyway, what you then posted, allowed me to get in there, so much obliged.
This kind of altitude picture: http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/pr...unity_Marathon-Valley_Sol3948map-MAIN_br2.jpg
The above picture came from this area of the site: Catalog Page for PIA19141
Do you misunderstand what I mean by 'enhancement'? I'm not talking about 'enlarging' when I say 'enhancement'. Different process.
I don't see the detail you have in your 'enlargements' in the original NASA pictures. Your enlargements have details that are not present in the NASA pictures - that's what I see. The details that pop up in your 'enlargements' would be the 'enhancements' I am suggesting.
I'm a bit annoyed that I don't know my way around the site sufficiently to get something like this for Sol 4073 (Panoramic Camera) - LINK: Mars Exploration Rover
One needs to see the sequence of photographs........
It's for sure intriguing. It is fun - as stated. But - what are we looking at? How far away? What is the scale? Assumptions are being made as to what we are looking at. Is this a rill of dirt? Or a mountain? It may be just a rill of dirt fairly close to the camera.
Look at the right foreground in this picture - http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/4073/1P489773179EFFCNK6P2413R1M1.JPG
These are interesting, shiny, smooth rocks.
Here we are - look at the foreground - http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/4073/1P489773398EFFCNK6P2413L7M1.JPG
A round shiny, smooth rock - the ground is littered with these rocks. So there's one sitting on the rill. Is that a very close rill of soil?
There are 'outcroppings' everywhere, or are we seeing the ground littered with boulders?
LINK: http://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/p/4073/1P489772991EFFCNK6P2413L7M1.JPG
Last edited: