• NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

Michael Schratt, Bob Lazar, Area 51

Free episodes:

Who is this narrator?

---------- Post added at 04:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:37 AM ----------

I went into Youtube version. 'AlienScientist'. Who is that? I watched a very scary vid in his lil site about GMO food, the scientists warning against it. I just HATE that citizens are being treated like guinea pigs. We need to do a "Cairo' against that.

Michael Shratt has --zero-- credibility if he believes 'Burisch'.
 
Alien Scientist comments on ...



I sent a email to George Knapp last night asking him to respond to the allegations been made against Lazar in this video. I Thank George for replying back to me so quickly. Here is the message.

I don't think I would characterize this as him "admitting" he never worked there. I can tell you this--when Bob was facing the pandering charges here in LV, he was investigated by our parole and probation Dept. because it is their job to recommend an appropriate sentence for all offenders. he told them that he worked for the Navy at S-4. If he were a fraud, that would have been the time to admit it since he was facing a long prison sentence if they found him to be not credible. At that time, he stuck to the same story he told me, even though it carried serious consequences for him. P&P employees became frustrated with Bob because they could not confirm his employment. However, in their report, they told the court that after contacting several govt. agencies to find out if Lazar had worked for them, the response they got wasn't a denial. Instead, the govt. told them that they did not have a need to know. Make of that whatever you want. (Those papers were posted online many years ago. I'm sure you can still find them somewhere.)

I think it's entirely possible Bob simply left that part of his history off of the bankruptcy filing since it had caused him so much trouble in the past and since he certainly knew that no one would ever confirm it anyway. If he were to tell the court that he worked there and the court then could not get confirmation from the govt.--which certainly would have been the case--it could only cause trouble for him.

That's my guess anyway. i have not talked to him about it.
 
LOL! This is some very funny stuff we have here. Most everyone knows I am a believer that Bob Lazar is a charlatan, but this guy.....Blue this and blue categorizing legitimatizes that....

And here we go again with the "white van" and the secrets....and the ooooooooo aaaaaaahhhhh mystery of it all.

See what I mean by "Roswelled Out."

I do agree with this narrator's position on Boylan though. In my opinion this guy has done more to hurt the real investigatory basis of this phenomenon than most could even hope to do in two lifetimes. I wish for once someone would stand up to him and state, "Mr. Boylan, PLEASE SHOW ME THE REAL PROOF you have with all your wild fantasies!" He connects this with that, this supposed reality with that one....on and on.

Lastly, I bet most of you would have thought I would most definitely agree about this guys stating that it's all "human" created and there is no E.T. influences, etc.

I never once stated that what has been happening in this world is "govt." driven alone....only I feel there is a lot to be said for, inter-dimensional, very much EVIL and OK "Primitive Alert", Demonic in intent.

ROSWELLED OUT!!!!
 
Michael Schratt is one guy who makes me skin crawl. A true researcher would follow the evidence where it leads and draw the conclusions based on that evidence. Instead, Schratt takes liars at their word and lectures across the United States using that information. He still refers to Dan Burisch as a "Doctor" despite the fact Burisch's collegent credentials are well established and it has been shown he does not have a Ph.D in anything (although Burisch curiously sometimes refers to his doctorate as a Sc.D which is another degree all together).

It angers me that guys like Schratt can dress the part and get a forum to speak at and then go on and spread such utter garbage. To this day he continues to lecture and include all of Dan Burisch's lies as legitimate information. Dan Burisch is the biggest and most laughable fraud in all of ufology. He never earned a Ph.D he never worked at Area 51, nor is he part of the "Majestic 12". He is a short, overweight, delusional old man who has read too many science fiction novels. Dan's "wife" Marice (also a Ph.D lol) is equally noxious.

Unfortunately for us Dan Burisch has since removed the best videos from his website. Previously he went as far as listing his "death toll" list, which was supposed to document the combat kills made by Burisch while a Special Forces operator. I believe one story had him in Iraq fighting "hand to hand" with Saddam's army all the way back to friendly forces. Another told of his mission to Libya to help the rebels kill Qaddafi's army. He posted a grainy video of him shooting a cap gun as proof of this mission. He then tried to auction the bullets off for charity. This should make him eligible to be brought up on stole valor charges.

Here is footage from another one of his "mission"

and we can't forget this

or the reading of his military orders
 
I love rambling back to the forum after a hiatus and seeing that little changes. Another thread referencing a charlatan... It's oddly comforting.
 
Michael Schratt is apparently "on staff" at Open Minds TV now. I think you're on the mark about him and certainly about Burisch. The Burisch thing has just gotten sadder and sadder over the years as he seems to have brought his daughter into the faux-reality show now. My favorite Marcie video is one of her "how to count cards" videos in which she admits to working in the Casino's for over twenty years and having both of her arms broken. I say its my favorite because it is probably the most honest video she had done.

Interestingly Burisch had a falling out with Schratt and Open Minds TV over the illustrations Schratt did for Dan's Area 51 story.
 
I can't tell you how disappointed I was to come across Schratt's work, only to discover he was a phony. He's done a lot of homework on legitimate Black programs, but has continued to insert some rather fantastic unsubstantiated alien & conspiracy theory material, the worst of which is the Burisch stuff.

Jim Moselely has been looking into the Cash-Landrum case in Saucer Smear, and he used some of Schratt's material from Open Minds on the nuclear powered WASP II . He bought in to Schratt's reputation and accepted him as credible largely due to his association with Open Minds magazine. Once I sent Jim some information on the real WASP II and Schratt's background, he published a correction.

I think Schratt is just a UFO entertainer. He spices up his presentations with whatever he thinks will interest his audience and earn him another a speaking invitation. He's part of the noise.
 
Seems like most of the u.f.o. stuff is just noise. I know that after all these years nobody has ever come to a lab with physical proof. Yet, they some keep saying it's a physical real time nuts and bolts alien visitation. Most of you know I'm not a fan of James Randi. (Don't worry, I'm not going off on a rant here.) ;) But, if the Randi challenge was issued to some of the u.f.o. folks I've seen on this board there would be no worries that the money would be won. Yet, we are talking nuts and bolts here. Not the "mind" or intuition. Just something to think about. The only nuts and bolts theory that makes sense to me is the "black ops" theory. I think something might well be going on. But, I don't think it's visitors from outer space.
 
I think Schratt is just a UFO entertainer. He spices up his presentations with whatever he thinks will interest his audience and earn him another a speaking invitation. He's part of the noise.

I think you have accurately described a great many people in the UFO/Paranormal talk show circuit set. There are entertainers who will regurgitate whatever they have digested from the Internet and other dubious researchers in books and lectures in an attempt to find the vein. One major vein being mined right now is the whole Annanaki /Planet Nibiro thing which only has so much time left before they need to find another. After Dec 2012 comes and goes without major event it will have to undergo some revision or either a new mime will take its place. You can see this with some of them clearer than others. Bursich for example would come out with some new ridiculous line of "research" every year or so.
 
Just to revive this old topic. I saw a repeat episode of Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory, the Area 51 special. In this TV show Michael Schratt is introduced as "a guy who says all of the stories of the Alien Technology is a bunch of bull." He goes on to say that there are no aliens at Area 51.

Let us not forget this is the same Michael Schratt who has made a virtual career speaking at UFO conferences, and peddling the stories of Dan Burisch to anyone who will listen!

Just another unqualified hack looking for their 15 minutes of fame!
 
Just to revive this old topic. I saw a repeat episode of Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory, the Area 51 special. In this TV show Michael Schratt is introduced as "a guy who says all of the stories of the Alien Technology is a bunch of bull." He goes on to say that there are no aliens at Area 51.

Let us not forget this is the same Michael Schratt who has made a virtual career speaking at UFO conferences, and peddling the stories of Dan Burisch to anyone who will listen!

Just another unqualified hack looking for their 15 minutes of fame!

What can possibly be expected in a topic of interest such as the Alien visitation phenomenon whereby sheer ideas and opinions alone become defended facts. Would you just as soon chastise someone whose all inclusively evidenced limitation borders on such geniuses as the likes of Col. John Alexander, or are you truly looking for the truth....and in this, allowing only the facts to guide your basis for understanding? I'm not pointing the finger directly at you withoutlimitso9, but it seems all to easy for some of those on this forum and other wannabe mediums to instantly lash out at anyone contradicting their personal "opinions", arguing against this new introspection for changing their presentation, not just to gain fame and fortune, but perhaps solely based on the premise that they finally figured out the truth and woke up instead!

I agree this guy might aggrandize and out right lie in his background or status, but is it for a "secret agenda" towards disinformation as nearly every well wisher for the alien visitation/crash, etc. placed these people in categorically, or is it to sincerely expose a charlatan for being a charlatan, and no other personal reason aspired too....

If it is the latter withoutlimit09, then I apologize....the former, then please tell us all why his "opinion" is so unjustified, and other contrary "opinions" are so factually driven.
 
What can possibly be expected in a topic of interest such as the Alien visitation phenomenon whereby sheer ideas and opinions alone become defended facts. Would you just as soon chastise someone whose all inclusively evidenced limitation borders on such geniuses as the likes of Col. John Alexander, or are you truly looking for the truth....and in this, allowing only the facts to guide your basis for understanding? I'm not pointing the finger directly at you withoutlimitso9, but it seems all to easy for some of those on this forum and other wannabe mediums to instantly lash out at anyone contradicting their personal "opinions", arguing against this new introspection for changing their presentation, not just to gain fame and fortune, but perhaps solely based on the premise that they finally figured out the truth and woke up instead!

I agree this guy might aggrandize and out right lie in his background or status, but is it for a "secret agenda" towards disinformation as nearly every well wisher for the alien visitation/crash, etc. placed these people in categorically, or is it to sincerely expose a charlatan for being a charlatan, and no other personal reason aspired too....

If it is the latter withoutlimit09, then I apologize....the former, then please tell us all why his "opinion" is so unjustified, and other contrary "opinions" are so factually driven.


I am merely pointing out that in front of one audience Michael Schratt argues that ET UFOs are nonsense and have nothing to do with Area 51, while at the same time, makes virtual career for himself on the UFO circuit peddling the Dan Burisch story and tall tales of alien bases. The purpose of this post was to simply note this large inconsistency. As I stated earlier, I maintain Schratt is a guy who enjoys being in the limelight and doesn't mind changing his point of view, if doing so means grabbing a selected speaking spot or being featured on a television show.
 
I am merely pointing out that in front of one audience Michael Schratt argues that ET UFOs are nonsense and have nothing to do with Area 51, while at the same time, makes virtual career for himself on the UFO circuit peddling the Dan Burisch story and tall tales of alien bases. The purpose of this post was to simply note this large inconsistency. As I stated earlier, I maintain Schratt is a guy who enjoys being in the limelight and doesn't mind changing his point of view, if doing so means grabbing a selected speaking spot or being featured on a television show.

And as I mentioned in his case, I tend to agree. When you state, "while at the same time"....does this mean that he is playing both sides of the isle? I would have hoped that he is now contradicting his earlier mistakes. Do you actually have an example of Mr. Schratt doing this at the same time?
 
In 2010 he was on Open Minds Radio peddling the Burisch story, when in fact this guy was exposed in the late 90's as a charlatan. In 2012, a DVD was released of his Project Aquarius/Dan Burisch presentation at the 2011 Open Minds UFO congress in Phoenix, Arizona. The Jesse Ventura Area 51 Episode aired in 2010....

So he was on the record in the lead up to JV's TV episode blabbering about aliens working along side Dan Burisch out at Area 51, then went onto that show to say any talk of aliens out at Area 51 was rubbish, then by 2011 he was back on the UFO circuit peddling the Burisch story again. So this is NOT an instance where he corrected himself or had a change of heart.
 
In 2010 he was on Open Minds Radio peddling the Burisch story, when in fact this guy was exposed in the late 90's as a charlatan. In 2012, a DVD was released of his Project Aquarius/Dan Burisch presentation at the 2011 Open Minds UFO congress in Phoenix, Arizona. The Jesse Ventura Area 51 Episode aired in 2010....

So he was on the record in the lead up to JV's TV episode blabbering about aliens working along side Dan Burisch out at Area 51, then went onto that show to say any talk of aliens out at Area 51 was rubbish, then by 2011 he was back on the UFO circuit peddling the Burisch story again. So this is NOT an instance where he corrected himself or had a change of heart.

OK then, doing some background research on Mr. Schratt I came up with what I see as his current position on Open Minds:

1. Michael Schratt

On this site it lists the various material he has presented in writing form over the years.

2. Michael Schratt | Openminds.tv

Clearly reporting incidents of other people's experiences. This does not allude to some form of favoritism toward UFO's as extra terrestrial beings differing from us in any way that I see.

One article dated July 11th 2011 discusses Roswell:

Roswell Revelations

Here he confirms his position on the "human" side to Roswell, going as far as presenting human examples and explanations for all the BS that made up the supposed crash landing and it's un human occupants.

You state that in 2011 he was propagating the Burisch story, which fits perfectly into what he seems to have continued to do all along on Open minds, even though, as you say, Burisch was proven to be a charlatan. I have a feeling this was done in quite the same form as Lazar being shown for the charlatan he was as well?

Here as early as 2010 we see Mr. Schratt discussing further, "UFO case files revealed pt III" in which he disseminates and justifies (with actual news clippings, military positions and usage illustrations) what these supposed UFO scenarios really were according to scientific analysis.

Then I watched the latest Area51 show that Jessie the Body Ventura put on TV....It had MR. Schratt emphasizing very similar information also found on the Open Minds site. the Burisch story, as well as other periodicals dating back 4 to 5 years.

Then I dug deeper into the records for the example you presented on Project Aquarius.

Michael Schratt: Project Aquarius | The 2012 Scenario

Even while reading the obvious crap within the rather long winded and ridiculous story by Burisch, I couldn't help but notice the end of his article which read:

“I have never met an alien, but I have met an extraterrestrial”….Dan Burisch, Sc. D.

The difference being that such an extraterrestrial such as a J-Rod is actually a future human, and therefore shares a similar human linage.

A true alien on the other hand, would bear no such direct human lineage.

Copyright 2010 by OpenM inds Production, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. OpenMinds is a registered trademark of OpenMinds Production, LLC."

Once again I do not see where Mr. Schratt, albeit somewhat out there with this article, is proposing that what the phenomenon seems to be, is un human or Alien...

This entire subject seems to be some crazy notion of time travel. One in which his position stays with as "findings" all along without change.

So how could he be changing his public agenda in order to steal the limelight, when what he seems to be doing is searching for, or perhaps he thinks he has, a terrestrial solvent for this question?

My guess is you misunderstood his intention, as you concluded he was a proponent of E.T. and then changed his mind for publicity or fame's sake:

Your Quote:

So he was on the record in the lead up to JV's TV episode blabbering about aliens working along side Dan Burisch out at Area 51..."

Perhaps you didn't mean to use the word, "aliens" in the context of extra terrestrial beings different than human? I found his position even here to be quite the contrary, as it seems he continues to keep to his guns.....

You would think that a man who is looking to just steal the limelight alone would do it in a manner inconsistent with a unified position....at least that would be a way of proving he was doing so just to get his 15 minutes of fame.

Either way, I don't see where he confirms any of it as a proven fact or his personal belief system. Perhaps we should give Mr. Schratt some slack.
 
Should I call you Mr. Schratt or are you his official spokesperson? ;)

I think we are playing semantics here, what ever is being referenced here is "alien" to our current time, space and understanding. But I think this is a trivial difference and not pertinent to my larger point. In the Jesse Ventura episode, Schratt is appearing to represent a mainstream position that nothing out of the ordinary is going out at Area 51 beyond black projects. He says any there is no "alien technology" at work at Area 51. Time traveling beings and their technology would certainly be "alien" to us. So this position contradicts the fantastical stories he peddles on the UFO circuit. I find it ironic that Schratt argues that any claim about "aliens" out at Area 51 is nonsense, then turns around and spends all his time speaking favorably about this VERY IDEA while interacting with a community of people who believe this wholeheartedly. I personally think unicorns are nonsense, I would happily say that on national television. I would not then turn around and headline the UNICORNS ARE REAL conference and sell DVDs of my presentation highlighting man's interaction with unicorns...


Oddly I am not the only person to pick up on this hypocrisy! Clearly you can see he peddles two different world views depending on audience. On mainstream TV, he is the grounded academic, on Project Camalot, he is the official spokesperson for Dan Burisch and his tales of taking over Majestic 12 and interacting with time traveling "aliens."

 
Back
Top