I find it funny how somehow peer review has come into such high regard. Most the great physicists, scientists who were the first to come up with the foundational modern theories we have today suffered
severe criticism for their theories and
did not listen to there colleagues. Tesla is an extreme, extreme example of this Einstein another. We are all now benefited the better because these people wouldn't back down when they knew they were the ones who were correct and not their hundreds of peers in opposition..
I'm not saying that Pye shouldn't give for peer review or that he won't benefit from it, but it's not the be all end all by any means.. Considering his position or any person in the position of having potential evidence of alien artifact; I don't think peer review makes a whole lot of since. Historically people in mainstream science have not even wanted to get involved at looking at the evidence unless it's ridiculously obvious.
David's problems with the star child skull are irrational to me.
Because some high minded anthropologists and whatever else dismiss the star child skull as cradle boarded hydrocephalus, that it means something?
It means next to nothing.
Why?
..because they can't provide any examples of anything like the skull; it seems just about that simple.
Pye has personally researched thousands of deformities throughout history.
You'd think there would be some scientist or skeptic out there that would want to adress the "deformities" of the skull as being something seen before or even address the skull as to
how a person could have had such deformities and why it's not unthinkable. I've yet to see any articles that even address it in any detailed manner and I've certainly looked. Those skeptical articles I've found address like 2 things and that's it and things Pye has long, long since addressed before.. And until I see that I have no reason to condem any of Pye's actions or thoughts on the skull.
Has anyone read anything countering Pye's arguments?
Other than counter productive articles like this one that don't actually address the skull in any real detail:
http://www.theness.com/articles.asp?id=30