Ok, just started listening, was busy nursing a sick wife yesterday and couldnt listen "live" like i like to.
I'm not far in yet, but i want to make this point before i continue.
i have no problems with Mr Dolans comments, including his opinion regards LMH,i absolutley respect his stance 100 percent, her enthusiam for the feild may or may not be outweighed, by any of the mistakes shes made, but it has to be counted none the less. personally i think she has been duped by the drone case, and being only human and worried about how that will affect the whole "reporter" image, would be loath to admit it. concerned about the impact to her "career" and standing, its a human thing to do, and as good an explaination as any. but i digress.
so this is not a critisism of Mr Dolan, or his opinions, i just wanted to point out what seemed to me to be a massive "logic gap", which i think needs addressing as it may be pivotal in other matters here.
there are 3 things that need to be sorted not 2.
what we know is true (which for the sake of argumant i'll posit as an absolute, and not the murky bowl of reality)
things we think may be true
and the last absolute, which is missing,
what we know to be false (again absolute only for the sake of argument, for it too is a murky bowl of soup in reality)
this third option is where Mr Biedny is "coming from", to ignore that facet, is going to leave him unsatisfied, if you are trying to answer his question.
the data must be sorted into three datasets not two, its that third dataset that forms the interface necessary for the answers to his questions.
the questions cannot be "resolved" unless that third option is part of the equation.
again not a critique of either personality, just a dirty great hole in the logic as i see it.
when your sorting these things into piles, there needs to be a pile for the things we know to be false, quite simply Mr Biedny, like many of us like to start with that pile first, and then work through the other two
I'm not far in yet, but i want to make this point before i continue.
i have no problems with Mr Dolans comments, including his opinion regards LMH,i absolutley respect his stance 100 percent, her enthusiam for the feild may or may not be outweighed, by any of the mistakes shes made, but it has to be counted none the less. personally i think she has been duped by the drone case, and being only human and worried about how that will affect the whole "reporter" image, would be loath to admit it. concerned about the impact to her "career" and standing, its a human thing to do, and as good an explaination as any. but i digress.
so this is not a critisism of Mr Dolan, or his opinions, i just wanted to point out what seemed to me to be a massive "logic gap", which i think needs addressing as it may be pivotal in other matters here.
there are 3 things that need to be sorted not 2.
what we know is true (which for the sake of argumant i'll posit as an absolute, and not the murky bowl of reality)
things we think may be true
and the last absolute, which is missing,
what we know to be false (again absolute only for the sake of argument, for it too is a murky bowl of soup in reality)
this third option is where Mr Biedny is "coming from", to ignore that facet, is going to leave him unsatisfied, if you are trying to answer his question.
the data must be sorted into three datasets not two, its that third dataset that forms the interface necessary for the answers to his questions.
the questions cannot be "resolved" unless that third option is part of the equation.
again not a critique of either personality, just a dirty great hole in the logic as i see it.
when your sorting these things into piles, there needs to be a pile for the things we know to be false, quite simply Mr Biedny, like many of us like to start with that pile first, and then work through the other two