Nathaniel
Paranormal Maven
You say that you came to this with a clean slate,however you reference several sources in later paragraphs that show you are in fact referencing materials and people in your views. I don't call that clean slate.
I made these references because they speak of the same things that I have been taught during my conversations. Before my conversations I had no idea about a 'higher self' and yet there are many others who speak of it, and this is just one example. So yes, I did go in with a clean slate, because I had no knowledge of spirituality beforehand, hence the hours of questions with Jed.
You won't convince me that so called meditation with a thing you met and named Jed is something anyone should simply take at face value.
I'm not going to try to 'convince' you one way or the other. Granted, I can't show you or even put into words the majority of the experiences I have had during meditation, but the channeled conversations are there to listen to so make of them what you will.
I don't think that all entities are malevolent. But going into something with a "clean slate" probably isn't the best approach.
On the contrary, I think it is the best approach. There are no preconceived notions of 'demons' and 'evil entities', or 'angels' for that matter. Just because something may work against what you believe to be good and righteous doesn't necessarily make it 'evil'. In fact, the only thing that could be considered 'evil' in the traditional sense is that which is created by human emotion. Fear, anger, hate, jealousy, and like the great Yoda once said, I sense much fear in you.
In your case you have admitted that you think these entities are good, but you have refused to admit that they might not be good.
They have never and will never do me or anybody else any harm. There, I admit it.
Determining what something is or isn't after the fact is similar to taking the long way home instead of using the road map.
You'll never truly determine what anything is if you do it before the fact.
I made these references because they speak of the same things that I have been taught during my conversations. Before my conversations I had no idea about a 'higher self' and yet there are many others who speak of it, and this is just one example. So yes, I did go in with a clean slate, because I had no knowledge of spirituality beforehand, hence the hours of questions with Jed.
You won't convince me that so called meditation with a thing you met and named Jed is something anyone should simply take at face value.
I'm not going to try to 'convince' you one way or the other. Granted, I can't show you or even put into words the majority of the experiences I have had during meditation, but the channeled conversations are there to listen to so make of them what you will.
I don't think that all entities are malevolent. But going into something with a "clean slate" probably isn't the best approach.
On the contrary, I think it is the best approach. There are no preconceived notions of 'demons' and 'evil entities', or 'angels' for that matter. Just because something may work against what you believe to be good and righteous doesn't necessarily make it 'evil'. In fact, the only thing that could be considered 'evil' in the traditional sense is that which is created by human emotion. Fear, anger, hate, jealousy, and like the great Yoda once said, I sense much fear in you.
In your case you have admitted that you think these entities are good, but you have refused to admit that they might not be good.
They have never and will never do me or anybody else any harm. There, I admit it.
Determining what something is or isn't after the fact is similar to taking the long way home instead of using the road map.
You'll never truly determine what anything is if you do it before the fact.
made me lol.
