Post-modern physics has a kind of black hole of its own: models of ever increasing complexity that are gobbled up into a singularity of endless speculation for lack of experimental verification. Although, astronomical data offer at least some support for the existence of phenomena with characteristics commensurate with the predicted behavior of black holes.
We know more and more about less and less.
My approach was to not look at the physics or electric universe, the scientific community or any of the theories regarding what a black hole is, what it does, or why it's important in the first place. In other words, I looked at the idea with the most basic of approach with the mind of one unencumbered by the educational complexities. Let's see what a third grader thinks with the hope no smart Alec post meaningless comments, but support the notion that there is merit to the explanation.
I saw this whole black hole news by the scientific community to be a front for a truth being hidden. What if, I asked myself, that by placing a charming invalid with a brain the size of a basketball drawing a paycheck year after year without ever a definitive resolution to what a black hole and if it even exists is to prevent mankind from understanding something we should know... or that our ancestors always knew and now that fundamental knowledge is forgotten.
I came across the Helical model of the solar system and studied it. What I realized is that if we were to think of our sun, let's start there, as a projectile moving in 70 thousand Kilometer per hour trajectory with respect to the spinning galaxy, perhaps what we see is the plasma field only and that the leading edge is not covered with plasma. Solar winds perhaps would explain why the trailing edge is bright with light only. Just that alone made it simple to describe the rest. First off, have we really ever seen the front of the sun if we're always behind it? Is NASA disclosing the truth or not? If the number of stars in the Milky Way Galaxy is estimated to be 100 billion, maybe it's really 200 billion because we can't see the back side of stars trailing behind the sun. Like looking back as you're running in the night you can't see your assailant as you look behind you unless they have a headlamp, but someone behind might if the person chasing you has a flashing indicator on their shoes or back of the belt. This is just to establish a point of reference. From our point of reference, and because stars move slowly with respect to distances, it may be that a star our solar system is following is visible until it passes behind a star in approach. The approaching star is dark, like a barrier, and the distant star beyond seems to be engulfed IF WE BELIEVE THAT when this happens, there must be this black hole that eats up stars. It's a simple matter of a magician performing an easily explained trick. Gone unexplained, the audience is kept in a state of confusion with rationale after complex rationale.... forever. The explanation for David Copperfield's disappearing Statue of Liberty trick was simple.. He turned the bleachers towards the dark ocean to the left of the statue, pulled the drapes, everyone was in awe, pulled the down a gain, spun them back around, and withdrew the drapes a second time to reveal the statue. It's all a frame of reference using a persons inability to detect slow motion, darkness through a window of bright lights at night and so on. You get the picture when you spend years trying to do the math on that.
This is where Stephen Hawking comes in handy as a front diversion scientist for the occult. He clouds the subject easily explained with math nobody understands... and when one does, there's an argument for lack of the simplest answer of the magicians trade. I'd have fired him for not producing anything other than photo ops for scientific journals and nothing more. But, because he does his job so well, I'd rather give pay raises so long as he keeps the deception alive and well if I am a traitor to man's knowledge and intellect. You see, science never offers the complete answer to anything because if it did, then you'd take one pharmaceutical pill and the problem goes away without a routine supply of prescriptions. Stephen Hawking is the routine supply of leveling drugs that never heals a problem... just look at his condition. There is a solution and he won't take it for himself and now it's too late.
The word black from what I understand originated from the Proto Indo European root word "Blheg" which means shine, flash, burn, etc. That may indicate the black holes are actually all stars and that because stars have been noted to be Stargates in some circles, they are hollow... they are holes and because the leading edge is dark, a black hole from that angle. And, if there's truth to Starmen and women, the only explanation for them thriving on the sun, or a star, is that there's no "fire on deck".
Here's the Helical model modified once again
We can make a simple model of the galaxy in which ping pong balls are painted black on one side and left white on the other. All of them oriented in the same direction and moving in a rotation about the galactic center. From anywhere around the relative position of our solar system on this model, there will be a number of stars we can see and those we can't when the alignment is just right. Our time frame of reference is mighty slow in which it would take a lifetime or several to see that the magic trick was simply one star blocked from view by another. The second we acknowledge that metering and measurement divices are the only proof we have to study them is the time when the answers will always be highly protected by science... after all, they made it all up and convinced us to believe their tools actually do work when they don't.
) taking place between the Electric Universe and the rest of science is fascinating to watch. Fact is, some of Quantum's undies are hanging out - and the electric universe handily ties up those lose ends. This is a debate I wish I could be in but cannot because it's outside my knowledge base. Still, I do know that there are innumerable problems with current theory and that makes it fair game by someone like Crothers, who gets the anomalies and pasted together explanations enough to spin his views persuasively to the layman's mind.
