Came across this video on another site, thought it interesting, maybe others will too?
SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY A PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+! For a low subscription fee, you will receive access to an ad-free version of The Paracast, the exclusive After The Paracast podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, plus show transcripts, the new Paracast+ Video Channel, Classic Episodes and Special Features categories! We now offer lifetime memberships! You can subscribe via this direct link:
The Official Paracast Store is back! Check out our latest lineup of customized stuff at: The Official Paracast Store!
Absolutely. Also here descriptions of the beings what they were wearing and all match what Travis Walton claimed in his case.That is a very powerful, convincing interview, Kieran. Thanks for posting.
I've a good memory the first video she's talks about the beings being human like having blonde hair been dressed in blue ski outfits and their facial expressions she described in the first video. She also describes them wearing a see through helmet over their heads (first video) Thats why i posted the Travis Walton image of the beings he saw. The beings he saw and this women saw are remarkably similar!!I didn't compare them in one sitting, so I can't be sure if the details of her story vary at all. Having just watched this version though, I was struck by her being able to see and recall details as distinct as the color of their clothing, length of their hair, and their facial expressions. She was even able to characterize the look in their eyes.
I'd have trouble with a witness claiming to get all that from seeing someone unusual in a car.
If the car was moving it would be difficult to discern who was in the car and what they were wearing and so forth. But if the car was in a stationary position that would not be the case.I worded that poorly. What I was trying to say was:
If instead, the beings had just been riding in a car, then I'd find the level of detail she reported incredible. Incredible as in not credible. Everything about her posture and expression indicates that she felt something as it happened and since. My take is that those feelings have caused her to interpret motives and emotions that may not have been present in any beings she may have seen.
Nice to have those additional details about the video! I hope you don't mind if I use some of it on the USI site and include a link over to Blue Blurry Lines.I took an interest in this story some years ago, but just got around to writing an article on it.
Mrs. Jessie Roestenburg was considered a particularly credible and sincere UFO witness. Her Oct. 21, 1954 sighting is famous, but it was neither the beginning or the end of her family's paranormal encounters.
Jessie Roestenburg’s 1954 UFO Encounter and Beyond