-
NEW! LOWEST RATES EVER -- SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY THE VERY BEST PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, eight years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast bonus podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Take advantage of our lowest rates ever! Act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
UFO Captured By Astronaut 4K Video
- Thread starter ISS Ufo Watch
- Start date
I must say that I often don't even look at every new video of a supposed UFO in the vicinity of the ISS, mainly because I'm positive that the more compelling footage is withheld. We are all aware of how often the feed cuts to another shot, or suffers 'technical problems' when things start getting interesting! To think of all the top-notch technology that makes it into space, the space agencies of the world are skimping on cameras for filming - often the grainiest rubbish that packs in every other hour...AS IF!
We know that NASA chose the Swedish optics makers Hasselblad for the Lunar missions and others. When one considers how often these days the live footage from the ISS seems to go grainy or cut out altogether, it just doesn't ring true. Surely considering the cost of missions to Earth orbit and beyond, and the importance of making the most accurate measurements and recordings of any type of data, it would be beyond unacceptable to have something like photography and live video feeds using crap technology that gives poor performance at best, and none at all quite often! Considering the lack of an atmosphere in the vacuum of space, it should be simple to record and broadcast the clearest, sharpest and highest-resolution of images but that does not seem to be the case?
The footage in this O.P is definitely interesting because the object does seem to alter course significantly whilst at speed too. At the very least, mission control should be up in arms about such a close-call in terms of possible collisions with space junk! Either the object is a fair size and further away than it looks, or it is a smaller object that looks metallic and solid, and more than capable of catastrophic destruction, should it collide with an orbiting module or satellite?
We know that NASA chose the Swedish optics makers Hasselblad for the Lunar missions and others. When one considers how often these days the live footage from the ISS seems to go grainy or cut out altogether, it just doesn't ring true. Surely considering the cost of missions to Earth orbit and beyond, and the importance of making the most accurate measurements and recordings of any type of data, it would be beyond unacceptable to have something like photography and live video feeds using crap technology that gives poor performance at best, and none at all quite often! Considering the lack of an atmosphere in the vacuum of space, it should be simple to record and broadcast the clearest, sharpest and highest-resolution of images but that does not seem to be the case?
The footage in this O.P is definitely interesting because the object does seem to alter course significantly whilst at speed too. At the very least, mission control should be up in arms about such a close-call in terms of possible collisions with space junk! Either the object is a fair size and further away than it looks, or it is a smaller object that looks metallic and solid, and more than capable of catastrophic destruction, should it collide with an orbiting module or satellite?
Simon
Paranormal Novice
4K video! And there was me thinking, great we might see something, but no, we see an object about the size of a pixel. Nice one.