• SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY A PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, five years young! For a low subscription fee, you will be able to download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive After The Paracast podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! FLASH! For a limited time, you can save up to 40% on your subscription. Long-term susbcribers will receive a free coupon code for the James Fox UFO documentary "The Phenomenon," which includes 3 hours of extras, while supplies last. It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

The Pentagon UAP Task Force Report Due By Summer 2021

Chuckleberryfinn

Paranormal Maven
Gene,

"The Air Force investigated UFOs in the 1950s and 60s and determined that there are no UFOs.."" blah blah blah.

More of the same. Nothing to see here.

All of the heightened excitement of late will lead to a tremendous disappointment. I really, really want to believe -- still. But, it aint gonna happen. Not this time. Not last time. Not next time.

I got excited enough recently to preorder Vallee's next book, The Best Kept Secret, after listening to his appearance on the Rogan show. But, I'm not optimistic about any coming revelations. Even if the book does contain amazing evidence, there will still be room for plausible deniability. Why? Because we will still only have one man, Dr. Vallee himself, insisting that he got these little bits of metal from a spacecraft. So we will have to take his word for it, and as much as his word means to me and others, it will not be enough.

Moreover, I recently learned about the "Pentacle Memorandum," which basically calls into doubt every single major UFO sighting since the early 50s as a possible psyop.

Read it here:


Nice to visit the website again, after years away. Be well.

CBF
 

Chuckleberryfinn

Paranormal Maven
So, I vote "meaningless excuse." The report will say that they looked into it and nothing of any significance was found, just like before. It may say something along the lines of finally admitting that they cannot identify certain cases with absolute certainty but that due to the nature of what can be known and deduced and all that -- "the word is still out. We must gather more data, and analyze it."
 

Gene Steinberg

Forum Super Hero
Staff member

Randall

J. Randall Murphy
Staff member

Randall

J. Randall Murphy
Staff member
I'm still not seeing anyplace that Bill S.3905 - Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 has actually been passed. Can anyone help to clarify this?


It says in the link below that it was passed by the Senate on July 23, 2020


What exactly does that mean? Is there more to be done before becoming law? What date does ( or did ) the clock actually start ticking on this bill? It looks to me like after passing the Senate, it still needs to go through the President. It's like it's in some kind of limbo to me? This might help:


If I'm reading all this right, it looks like there are several steps left to go before the bill becomes law.
 
Last edited:

Gene Steinberg

Forum Super Hero
Staff member
I read it was part of the bill passed at the end of the year, the one Trump dithered with and complained about before actually signing it. It's over 5,000 pages long, if you want to search it out.
 

Randall

J. Randall Murphy
Staff member
I read it was part of the bill passed at the end of the year, the one Trump dithered with and complained about before actually signing it. It's over 5,000 pages long, if you want to search it out.
I found this:


But the actual government page says it's not been made law yet. It hasn't even passed the Committee phase.
 

blowfish

Whittingham
Listening to Art Bell show (classic) from years ago Dr Marcel on the "tap recording " . Remember sitting with two US Veterans who never spoke out and told us about the Roswell Crash in July 1947 and the meeting on monarchy estate that happend months before bentwater events -never been alone-hey Elon - the great show Don did for the memory of Rich -fine man. God Bless .
 

Randall

J. Randall Murphy
Staff member
As of the date of this post, the congress.gov website does not indicate Bill S.3905 as passed into law. However a write-up on heavy.com says that it was included in a COVID-19 relief bill that he signed on December 27, 2020, which means that the deadline would be June 25, 2021, which as of the date I wrote this post means 163 days are remaining in the countdown.

Our friends at The Debrief however caution that the UAP report provision is not binding law, so there is no guarantee the public will be provided with any comprehensive information on UAP. Additionally, if the UAP Task Force deems certain information classified, the legislative branch does not have the authority to declassify that information in order to make it publicly available.

Directives to be handled by the Director of National Intelligence


1. A detailed analysis of unidentified aerial phenomena data and intelligence reporting collected or held by the Office of Naval Intelligence, including data and intelligence reporting held by the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force;
2. A detailed analysis of unidentified phenomena data collected by:
a. geospatial intelligence;
b. signals intelligence;
c. human intelligence; and
d. measurement and signals intelligence;
3. A detailed analysis of data of the FBI, which was derived from investigations of intrusions of unidentified aerial phenomena data over restricted United States airspace;
4. A detailed description of an inter-agency process for ensuring timely data collection and centralized analysis of all unidentified aerial phenomena reporting for the Federal Government, regardless of which service or agency acquired the information;
5. Identification of an official accountable for the process described in paragraph 4;
6. Identification of potential aerospace or other threats posed by the unidentified aerial phenomena to national security, and an assessment of whether this unidentified aerial phenomena activity may be attributed to one or more foreign adversaries;
7. Identification of any incidents or patterns that indicate a potential adversary may have achieved breakthrough aerospace capabilities that could put United States strategic or conventional forces at risk; and
8. Recommendations regarding increased collection of data, enhanced research and development, and additional funding and other resources.

The report shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
 

Jenny Chan

Skilled Investigator
I know many people are cynical about it, but I believe that this will get the ball rolling to make Biden the Disclosure President and our reality is about to change in the next 4 years. My pet theory? When Stephen Bassett speaks on The Paracast, we need to take notes because he is giving us the inside scoop. His November 15, 2020 episode is going to be cited one day as "predicting" Disclosure and Contact down to every last detail. Gene and Randall will be famous for publishing that interview! Ironic because they doubt it will happen. :D
 

marduk

quelling chaos since 2352BC
I'm totally cynical. Not only do I think they won't disclose much, if anything... I don't think they have much to disclose at all.

I mean, the tic tac and fast mover videos are interesting, but they don't tell us anything we don't already know. If anything, there has been comparable photographic and video evidence for decades.

My read is that the Military-Industrial complex is late to the party and behind, if anything.
 

Chuckleberryfinn

Paranormal Maven
Thanks for the link, Mr. Randall.

This part of the Pentacle memorandum raises several questions:

"Coverage should be so complete that any object in the air could be tracked, and information as to its altitude, velocity, size, shape, color, time of day, etc. could be recorded. All balloon releases or known balloon paths, aircraft flights, and flights of rockets in the test area should be known to those in charge of the experiment. Many different types of aerial activity should be secretly and purposefully scheduled within the area."

Here are the questions that Vallee rightly asks:

What were the results of that experiment? Is it still ongoing? Or, when did it end? Which sightings were staged (any well known cases?)? Where were these high profile test areas?

To my knowledge that is the extent of the fuss that Vallee raises about the memorandum, and despite the close reading on that website, they're questions that should still be asked. That's why I say that they call into question every major UFO sighting since the early fifties.

On another note, a lot of talk has been floating around lately regarding the so called "simulation hypothesis" for the reality that we inhabit. Have any UFOlogists been talking about this hypothesis in the context of the UFO phenomenon? It seems to me that the behavior of the UFO phenomenon is comparable to the level of control that a computer programmer has over his/her computer program. Disappearing/reappearing instantly; being physically located in multiple places at once; defiance of laws of inertia; objects breaking apart into multiple, independent objects, as in the Rendelsham forest case; control over electronic systems, as in the Malmostrom missile base case, although in that case I do not believe any of the nonsense reported by the military for a tiny second. And so forth. My point is to say that the UFOs themselves could be akin to digital avatars that the programmers of the simulation inhabit when they visit their program. When I play the RTS game "Star Wars: Galactic Battlegrounds," I can pause the game and type in the command, "Simonsays," and then I summon an invulnerable killer Ewok who has total control over the game. Similarly, a UFO could be like a digital cheat code employed by the simulators to make interaction with our reality safer. The horror that the simulation hypothesis suggests to me is basically the Gnostic religion come to life. The horror of that possibility is such that a "cover-up" would be absolutely warranted, and any disclosure of the truth would be far too horrifying and must be avoided at all costs.
 

Top