• SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY A PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+! For a low subscription fee, you will receive access to an ad-free version of The Paracast, the exclusive After The Paracast podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, plus show transcripts, the new Paracast+ Video Channel, Classic Episodes and Special Features categories! We now offer lifetime memberships! You can subscribe via this direct link:
    https://www.theparacast.com/plus/

    The Official Paracast Store is back! Check out our latest lineup of customized stuff at: The Official Paracast Store!

    Subscribe to The Paracast Newsletter!

SasySquatchGirl


Gene Steinberg

Forum Super Hero
Staff member
Would be better with Trump’s picture. If she had show business skills the outcome would have been different.
 

Thomas R Morrison

Paranormal Adept
Another excellent and entertaining blog post, sasysquatchgirl - I didn't notice that the title was a link at first, so click on it folks!

Would be better with Trump’s picture. If she had show business skills the outcome would have been different.
She didn't need show business skills, Gene - she needed a platform that people could get excited about. But instead, she promised more of the status quo - which is exactly what the electorate didn't want. Hillary Clinton lost the election to a wicked blithering idiot because she's an entitled, arrogant, corrupt corporatist sell-out, and everyone knew it. Bernie Sanders has the charisma of a dried prune, and yet he was crushing Trump in the polls by 10-15 points. So we have President Trump because the Democrats rigged the primary against their strongest candidate, in favor of the most unpopular presidential candidate in the history of the Democratic Party. They're the ones to blame for this.
 

Thomas R Morrison

Paranormal Adept
How was the primary rigged?
I think it would be a lot easier to answer the question "In what way wasn't the primary rigged?" Because they primary was rigged in every manner imaginable.

First, Clinton and Wasserman Schultz bought up the superdelegates before the primary voting even got started:
https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/04/01/how-hillary-clinton-bought-the-loyalty-of-33-state-democratic-parties/

Then Hillary took complete control of the DNC under a binding legal contract that turned the DNC into an arm of her campaign: in this contract, which was revealed in Donna Brazile's book, Hillary was explicitly granted complete control of the DNC PR department so she could control the messaging through the corporate news media (MSNBC, the NYT, CNN, etc.), as well as their Strategy and Hiring and Accounting departments, among the rest of the DNC's organizational structure. This assured that Clinton would be favored in all press and internal processes. The contract went into effect on September 1st, 2015 - months before voting started:
Inside Hillary Clinton’s Secret Takeover of the DNC
Donna Brazile Says She Has “Proof” Clinton Rigged the Primary

The DNC email leaks and the Podesta email leaks revealed that the DNC (under Clinton's complete control, we now know) was colluding with all of the major news media to rig the election in favor of Clinton, while her people planted unfavorable stories in the press attacking Bernie Sanders and his millions of energized supporters:
Here are the latest, most damaging things in the DNC’s leaked emails

And then there were the massive purged voter rolls in many keys states such as New York, where an estimated 200,000 Democratic voters were illegally stricken from the rolls, mostly from Brooklyn, Bernie Sanders' home district:
https://nypost.com/2017/10/25/nyc-elections-board-admits-to-purging-voters-from-rolls/

But perhaps the worst election tampering occurred in California, where exit polling was cancelled right before the primary voting took place, and the state election board (run by a devout Clinton loyalist) used every dirty trick in the book to rig the primary against Sanders' enormous army of voters:
Was the Democratic Primary Just Manipulated, or Was It Stolen?

Frankly we can't quantify the extent of the electronic vote tampering in the primaries because the US has the least secure voting machines and the lowest election integrity rating in the industrialized world. Without the hand-counted paper ballot system that our allies use, there's no way to check the records - any state could be swung by 20 points and we'd have no way of proving it.

But clearly even without any means to prove the electronic vote tampering, we have irrefutable evidence that the Democratic primary was rigged in every other way as well.

The fix was in long before the primary even started. And the people we've relied on to report on such stories were all in on it, so they've engaged in a massive cover-up of all these stories, to cover their own behinds. In the final analysis, two things are clear:

1.) Bernie Sanders had a consistent 10-15-point lead over Trump in the general election polls so he would have won the presidency:
https://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_sanders-5565.html

2.) The Clinton/DNC/media cabal conspired to rig the primary for Hillary Clinton even though she polled neck-in-neck with Trump throughout the primary, so that complete corruption of the primary process directly resulted in the Trump presidency.

The entire "RussiaGate" conspiracy theory is a smokescreen to deflect attention from these facts.
 
Last edited:

Gene Steinberg

Forum Super Hero
Staff member
The entire "RussiaGate" conspiracy theory is a smokescreen to deflect attention from these facts.
Tell the to the 19 people arrested, and those among them who confessed already.

There was a crime, and Trump committed obstruction before our eyes, when he admitted on TV that Comey was fired because of the Russia investigation.

The intelligence agencies concluded that Russia did meddle, that it was likely under Putin's authority, and targeted Clinton.

When Comey revealed the investigation into emails in Weiner's laptop days before the election, he basically elected Trump. Trump should have thanked him, not attacked him.
 

Thomas R Morrison

Paranormal Adept
Tell the to the 19 people arrested, and those among them who confessed already.
19 people have been charged, not arrested. 13 of those are Russians who posted a few stupid memes on facebook. The rest have been swept up in the McCarthyist dragnet that Mueller has cast to force people to testify about the collusion with the Russians that never happened.

There was a crime
Fine: name it. Hint: "collusion" isn't a crime in our legal system; nor is "consorting," "befriending" or "fraternizing." A few of them lied because they were afraid of getting caught up in the witch-hunt, and a few of them got busted for unrelated corruption, but there's still zero evidence that Trump or his people actually colluded with the Russian government regarding the 2016 election.

Trump committed obstruction before our eyes, when he admitted on TV that Comey was fired because of the Russia investigation.
Comey used the bogus Steele dossier that Hillary Clinton purchased from Fusion GPS to convince a FISA court to spy on Trump's campaign. I would've fired him too. Comey also conducted a cover-up "investigation" to absolve Hillary for her crimes in deliberately transferring classified intelligence to her unencrypted basement server, which was almost certainly hacked by most if not all of our nation's adversaries. That's why we have President Trump: if Comey had done his job and indicted her, then we'd have President Sanders today instead of President Trump.

The intelligence agencies concluded that Russia did meddle, that it was likely under Putin's authority, and targeted Clinton.
Three small Clinton-leaning groups of operatives in the CIA, NSA, and the FBI reported their opinions/narratives about the Russian hacking allegations, and all of those reports were totally bereft of any empirical evidence to support their opinions - I know, I've read all of them, looking for any actual evidence. There's none there. And the original assessment by CrowdStrike (a DNC private contractor - the FBI was refused access to their servers) was later found to contain a pivotal error - there was no "similar hacking" of the Ukrainian ground-based missile systems by the Russians, which was the basis of their assessment of Russian involvement. It turned out to all come down to a clerical error in the number of missile launchers in the area at the time.

We had similar reports of WMD's in Iraq (to prompt us into an illegal war), and look how that turned out. There have also been three false flag chemical attacks in Syria that our intelligence agencies quickly blamed on Assad, which have turned out to offer zero evidence of Assad's culpability. In fact the material in the second chemical weapon attack, in 2014, was found to originate in Turkey, not Syria. And the man behind those three intelligence reassessments, former ODNI James Clapper (who has flatly stated that there's no evidence of Trump/Russia collusion), perjured himself before the Senate Intelligence Committee when he denied the existence of the PRISM program (which then prompted Snowden to release his evidence about that program - which was subsequently ruled to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court). These are the people you're trusting now to tell you the truth: war criminals and known perjurers.

When Comey revealed the investigation into emails in Weiner's laptop days before the election, he basically elected Trump. Trump should have thanked him, not attacked him.
Actually Comey sat on that information for several weeks before announcing that they'd re-opened the investigation. In any case Comey is directly responsible for President Trump, but only through corruption and ineptitude, so I don't think that the bloviating baboon owes him any gratitude.
 

Gene Steinberg

Forum Super Hero
Staff member
Comey used the bogus Steele dossier that Hillary Clinton purchased from Fusion GPS to convince a FISA court to spy on Trump's campaign. I would've fired him too. Comey also conducted a cover-up "investigation" to absolve Hillary for her crimes in deliberately transferring classified intelligence to her unencrypted basement server, which was almost certainly hacked by most if not all of our nation's adversaries. That's why we have President Trump: if Comey had done his job and indicted her, then we'd have President Sanders today instead of President Trump.
No. The actual application indicated that the Steele dossier which has never been disproven, was only a small part of the presentation. Even the Republican version of the memo that got so much publicity indicates that.

So Clinton should have been indicted because she overlooked 3 confidential messages not properly marked?

So called classified emails were relabeled classified after they were sent.

There is no evidence that her private server wasn't encrypted or otherwise secured. That's fake news. There is no public testimony from the IT person who set it up about the security precautions used. You are citing the fake Fox News version of this story, not what really happened.

If it was a standard Exchange server, just installing it would have established a basic set of security precautions.

And consider Colin Powell, who used AOL for his email, and then destroyed all of it rather than turning over copies to the State Department when he left. How much classified information did he send out anyway?

Why wasn't he investigated?

Obvious. Judicial Watch, which filed the original complaint in court, wanted to discredit Clinton. But she totally screwed up her explanation of what she did, which is why it seemed she was being secretive. The idiots in her campaign didn't know how to respond to questions about it. I cringe at their idiotic answers, since I have managed email servers for years.

Fine: name it. Hint: "collusion" isn't a crime in our legal system; nor is "consorting," "befriending" or "fraternizing." A few of them lied because they were afraid of getting caught up in the witch-hunt, and a few of them got busted for unrelated corruption, but there's still zero evidence that Trump or his people actually colluded with the Russian government regarding the 2016 election.
Right about collusion.

But there is a lot of reason for suspicion. It seemed that everyone around Trump was contacting Russians. Trump never expected to win, so he was working to set up businesses, including a Trump tower, in Russia.

If he was totally innocent, why is he using the O.J. Simpson defense, blaming the authorities because he has no valid defense?

What does he have to hide when he attacks a Republican Justice Department led by his own appointees? He's so defensive about it he must be near frightened to death.
 

Thomas R Morrison

Paranormal Adept
No. The actual application indicated that the Steele dossier which has never been disproven
That’s not how empirical reasoning works Gene: the burden of proof is on the claimant. There’s no such thing as “the burden of disproving.” Not a single claim in the Steele dossier has been confirmed, and many journalists have tried.

was only a small part of the presentation.
I’m aware of the corporate Democrat spin on this. I simply stated that it was used, not that it was the only evidence presented. It’s egregious that it was used at all, because all of the claims that can be checked have been refuted. The rest reads like garbage pulp fiction because it is.

Even the Republican version of the memo that got so much publicity indicates that.
FactCheck.org disagrees with you:

“The GOP memo contends that the dossier “formed an essential part of the Carter Page FISA application” and that McCabe had testified in December “that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the FISC without the Steele dossier information.”
Q&A on the Nunes Memo - FactCheck.org

And so does The Hill:

“For all the hype and breathless commentary by Democrat cheerleaders in the media, the memo released on Friday by the House Intelligence Committee Democrats fails to live up to its key claims.

1. It provides no information to disprove the Republican claim that the Department of Justice and the FBI relied heavily on the phony Steele Trump-Russia “dossier” to obtain the first of four FISA search warrants against Trump volunteer, Carter Page.
2. It fails to establish that DoJ and the FBI properly informed the FISA court that the fake Steele dossier had been commissioned and paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign.
3. It fails to counter the GOP claim that FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe admitted to the House Intelligence committee during his closed-door testimony on December 19, 2017 that without the dossier, the government never could have obtained a FISA court warrant to spy on U.S. citizen Carter Page.”
Democrat's FISA memo doesn’t refute GOP charges

Even So Clinton should have been indicted because she overlooked 3 confidential messages not properly marked? So called classified emails were relabeled classified after they were sent.
No that’s all wrong. She had Special Access Program intelligence on her server:
Hillary Clinton Emails Held Info Beyond Top Secret: IG

Some of that was ORCON intelligence that couldn’t even be privately provided to the members of the Congressional subcommittee investigating the security breach:

And even Comey admitted that she had 110 emails that were classified at time they were sent/received, among which were:

8 email chains classified top secret
36 email chains classified secret
8 email chains classified confidential

There is no evidence that her private server wasn't encrypted or otherwise secured. That's fake news.
You’re dead wrong. Her private email server didn’t even have an SSL Certificate for the first three months (so her emails could have been intercepted in transit with no encryption):
For 3 months Hillary Clinton’s email access was unencrypted, vulnerable to spies

And we know for a fact that her server itself was never encrypted because Datto Inc., the company that backed up her data for Platter River Networks, sent Platte River this warning about the issue in August of 2015:

“[W]e have some concerns relative to data security,” the Connecticut storage firm, Datto, told Platte River Networks in an August 2015, email
“Platte has not enabled encryption at the local device. Given the sensitive, high-profile nature of the data which is alleged in press reports to potentially reside on the Datto device, it may be the target of cyber attack from a multitude of highly sophisticated and capable entities or individuals,” it added. “We believe such an event could place the unencrypted data itself at risk, as well as expose both Datto and Platte River systems to collateral damage.”
Clinton email server company warned about security

There is no public testimony from the IT person who set it up about the security precautions used. You are citing the fake Fox News version of this story, not what really happened.
We don’t need Brian Pagliano’s testimony about this because of the Datto Inc. / Platte River email above. You’re just repeating the fake news you hear from MSNBC and CNN etc., which is now just as bad as Faux News. No corporate news media can be trusted; they're all liars/manipulators. Rachel Maddow is just the Democrat equivalent of Sean Hannity now.

And consider Colin Powell, who used AOL for his email, and then destroyed all of it rather than turning over copies to the State Department when he left. How much classified information did he send out anyway?
Colin Powell had a .gov email address that he used for state business, and also a private email account like everyone else on the planet. Clinton never even set up a .gov account – all of her emails as Secretary of State went through her unencrypted private email server.

Why wasn't he investigated?
Because the two cases aren’t even remotely comparable:

“The State Department inspector general eventually found some messages sent to Powell's private account and concluded that two of them contained classified information, although it was unclear whether they should have been treated as classified at the time they were sent by ambassadors and forwarded to Powell by his staff.”
Judge: Drive to recover Colin Powell's emails could be fruitful

But there is a lot of reason for suspicion. It seemed that everyone around Trump was contacting Russians. Trump never expected to win, so he was working to set up businesses, including a Trump tower, in Russia.
Russia isn’t a communist country anymore – it’s capitalist now, and a lot of people do business with them, including the Clintons. I have yet to see any evidence that merits suspicion with regard to any Trump/Russia election interference.

If he was totally innocent, why is he using the O.J. Simpson defense, blaming the authorities because he has no valid defense?
Defense for what? We still have zero evidence for any crime - and by god they've been looking hard for two years now, and the FBI even had a man on the inside of his campaign. Still: bupkis.

What does he have to hide when he attacks a Republican Justice Department led by his own appointees? He's so defensive about it he must be near frightened to death.
Trump attacks everyone, especially his own appointees, all across the board. He doesn’t seem frightened to me; he seems annoyed. I’d be annoyed too if the corrupt corporate news media kept droning on about some imaginary McCarthyist fever dream for two years with zero credible evidence to back any of it up.

Look Gene, RussiaGate is the Democrat version of the birther conspiracy myth – a miserable excuse to try to delegitimize the presidency of the opposition party. Nothing more. Sad to see both sides have sunk to the same paranoid/delusional level. We should be attacking these people for the insane policies that they’re actually passing (with the help of the Democrats in most cases), not focusing all of our attention on some fake conspiracy theory dreamed up by mendacious sociopaths like Podesta and Mook and Clinton.

I really wish there were a viable left-wing party in this country. But the Democrats and the Republicans are both right-wingers now. Hillary Clinton’s 2016 platform was indistinguishable from Ronald Reagan’s political platform. The whole rotten system makes me want to puke. As this 2014 Princeton study proved, the American people no longer have any voice in our government - the whole system (Democrats and Republicans alike) is owned by the billionaire political donor class and multinational corporations:

"Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence. The results provide substantial support for theories of Economic-Elite Domination and for theories of Biased Pluralism, but not for theories of Majoritarian Electoral Democracy or Majoritarian Pluralism."
https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/mgilens/files/gilens_and_page_2014_-testing_theories_of_american_politics.doc.pdf
 
Last edited:

Gene Steinberg

Forum Super Hero
Staff member
You’re dead wrong. Her private email server didn’t even have an SSL Certificate for the first three months (so her emails could have been intercepted in transit with no encryption):
For 3 months Hillary Clinton’s email access was unencrypted, vulnerable to spies
The SSL is installed for the domain, not for the email system. If it wasn't installed properly, that would be a lapse of the IT person, not Clinton who is definitely not tech savvy. On the other hand, is there any evidence that it was thus hacked?

Alas, you cannot blame Clinton about this, you can blame the people who worked for her. Installing an SSL is a trivial matter. Indeed, the two major server control panels, cPanel and Plesk, give you free SSLs that are updated automatically. I haven't had a need to even think about the process ever since we switched to secured sites a couple of years back.

Colin Powell had a .gov email address that he used for state business, and also a private email account like everyone else on the planet. Clinton never even set up a .gov account – all of her emails as Secretary of State went through her unencrypted private email server.
It appears to have only been unencrypted for a short time. But State Department regulations didn't require using a .gov address, nor did Powell always use a .gov address for his business mail. In fact, he advised Clinton about his setup.

Says Powell: ""With respect to records, if I sent an email from my public email account to an addressee at another public email account it would not have gone through State Department servers. It was a private conversation similar to a phone call. If I sent it to a state.gov address it should have been captured and retained by State servers," Powell said. "I was not aware at the time of any requirement for private, unclassified exchanges to be treated as official records."

Thus admitting he sent email from his "public email account" to "a state.gov address."

At worst, Clinton was naive about the process, but State Department email was far from the most secure.

Russia isn’t a communist country anymore – it’s capitalist now, and a lot of people do business with them, including the Clintons. I have yet to see any evidence that merits suspicion with regard to any Trump/Russia election interference.
You're not paying attention. American's intelligence agencies all agree on this. From the indictments from the special prosecutor, it's clear that there were Russians charged with manipulating social networks and some campaign events to favor Trump.
Trump attacks everyone, especially his own appointees, all across the board. He doesn’t seem frightened to me; he seems annoyed. I’d be annoyed too if the corrupt corporate news media kept droning on about some imaginary McCarthyist fever dream for two years with zero credible evidence to back any of it up.
Nothing imaginary about that coverage. Trump himself admits that he raves about fake news because he wants to discredit the mainstream media so people won't believe them when they present negative stories about him.

Clearly you fell for his scam.

Indeed there is so much evidence of questionable contacts between Trump's fellow criminals and Russians and representatives from other countries, you wonder how anyone can overlook it all.

Once again, why should an innocent party be so defensive about an investigation, and try so hard to discredit it? An innocent party should just say bring it on and cooperate. Even Nixon didn't raise near as much of a fuss.
 

Thomas R Morrison

Paranormal Adept
The SSL is installed for the domain, not for the email system. If it wasn't installed properly, that would be a lapse of the IT person, not Clinton who is definitely not tech savvy. On the other hand, is there any evidence that it was thus hacked?
Actually they know of at least one hack and a slew of attacks. But former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, and others, have stated that the odds are high that it was hacked by foreign states:

And we know about specific instances when the server was attacked and subsequently manually shut down. Plus we know that John Podesta’s email was hacked, and so was her close confidant Sydney Blumenthal’s email account. So I’d say there’s a >95% chance that she was hacked as well, and probably by multiple state parties: they'd have to be incompetent to fail to hack an unencrypted home server with no dedicated staff oversight.

Alas, you cannot blame Clinton about this, you can blame the people who worked for her.
She was the decider, so to speak. It’s all on her. Unquestionaing Democratic loyalists are always quick to point out how qualified and experienced she was after decades in top-level politics, but whenever she intentionally orders her people to transfer classified government data to her server, suddenly she’s as blameless as a newborn lamb. It’s pretty funny.

It appears to have only been unencrypted for a short time.
So you either ignored my last post entirely, or you didn’t understand the evidence that I provided.

She didn’t even have an SSL certificate for the first three months – that encrypts the transmissions. The server itself was never encrypted, so her data was never encrypted, meaning that anyone who hacked the system could steal the unencrypted emails. The Datto Inc. email that I provided above proves that her server itself was never encrypted, so the data stored on it was never encrypted. That’s the main problem (besides evading all government transparency laws in the process).

But State Department regulations didn't require using a .gov address
PolitiFact disagrees with you:
Hillary Clinton's email: Did she follow all the rules?

The Inspector General’s report refutes this argument as well:
State Dept. inspector general report sharply criticizes Clinton’s email practices

And we now know that she had top secret intelligence on her private email server, and it’s illegal to transfer classified intelligence to a private server. Peons like you and me have been jailed for far less egregious violations of the classification laws, like this poor kid who went to jail for taking a selfie in a submarine:
US Navy sailor jailed for taking photos of classified areas of nuclear submarine

Says Powell: ""With respect to records, if I sent an email from my public email account to an addressee at another public email account it would not have gone through State Department servers. It was a private conversation similar to a phone call. If I sent it to a state.gov address it should have been captured and retained by State servers," Powell said. "I was not aware at the time of any requirement for private, unclassified exchanges to be treated as official records."

Thus admitting he sent email from his "public email account" to "a state.gov address."
Did you read that through a fun-house mirror? He sent private personal messages through his private email account, like we all do every day. She stored Special Access Program intelligence on a home-brew server that was never encrypted. Powell’s case is a minor oversight, her case is a major and deliberate breach of national security.

At worst, Clinton was naive about the process, but State Department email was far from the most secure.
At least it’s encrypted.

I’ll never understand why people bend over backwards to defend the likes of Hillary Clinton – probably the most warmongering and historically corrupt corporatist sociopath in recent political history. This woman would feed you into a meat grinder if her dog was hungry. And yet people swoon over her innocence and imaginary heroism. It’s freaky to see the impact that the corrupt corporate news media can have on the human mind.

You're not paying attention. American's intelligence agencies all agree on this.
No Gene, you’re following the headlines without doing any follow-up: the bogus “17 intelligence agencies agree” lie that Clinton pushed through the corporate news media was proven to be complete BS. It was three groups of Clinton loyalists in three agencies, the CIA, the NSA, and the FBI, (and one individual, ODNI James Clapper) who pushed the retarded RussiaGate narrative for Her Highness. Here’s a video of James Clapper admitting that it was only three agencies:
Clapper Confirms: "17 Intelligence Agencies" Russia Story Was False

From the indictments from the special prosecutor, it's clear that there were Russians charged with manipulating social networks and some campaign events to favor Trump.
Indictments aren’t proof of anything. Those Russians only posted a few stupid memes on social media, and promoted some small political rallies on both sides of the political spectrum. Clinton and her psycho buddy David Brock spent $10M on operatives posting under fake profiles all over social media throughout the primary and general election. I want to see them prosecuted for meddling with our election process, not the Russians:
Correct The Record Summary | OpenSecrets

Nothing imaginary about that coverage. Trump himself admits that he raves about fake news because he wants to discredit the mainstream media so people won't believe them when they present negative stories about him.

Clearly you fell for his scam.
What a joke. I know that Trump pushes the fake news narrative for his own benefit, but again and again and again and again, the BS corporate fake news that you seem to rely upon solely for your information, has demonstrated that it's nothing more than state propaganda; the WMD’s in Iraq, the news blackouts on the endless mass murder operations abroad, the entire 2016 primary, the bogus Syria reporting and the fake narratives about the “moderate rebels” (aka Al-Nusra/al-Qaeda/ISIS “rebels”) – all corporate news media is lies and propaganda Gene, even MSNBC and CNN.

Indeed there is so much evidence of questionable contacts between Trump's fellow criminals and Russians and representatives from other countries, you wonder how anyone can overlook it all.
I had borscht a few weeks ago, so I must be a Kremlin agent. That’s the kind of “evidence” these liars are pushing 24/7. It’s bewildering that anyone falls for it. The corporate news media is not your friend Gene – they’re not trying to inform your mind, they’re trying to control it. And it’s working.

Once again, why should an innocent party be so defensive about an investigation, and try so hard to discredit it? An innocent party should just say bring it on and cooperate. Even Nixon didn't raise near as much of a fuss.
You’re assuming that it’s true, and then basing your assessment of his behavior on that assumption without any compelling evidence whatsoever.

Imagine if it isn’t true, for five seconds. Two years of constant RussiaGate hysteria with so many fake stories and retractions that I’ve lost count of them all – I’d be pretty angry about it too. Being falsely accused of being in cahoots with the Russians, nonstop for years on end with zero evidence, would set me off as well.
 
Last edited:

Thomas R Morrison

Paranormal Adept
C'mon, it's not that complicated guys. Gene said the following statement, clearly bemoaning the outcome of the 2016 presidential election and suggesting that it was Hillary Clinton's lack of show business skills that cost them the election:

Would be better with Trump’s picture. If she had show business skills the outcome would have been different.
And I just couldn't let it slide, because I'm sick of the Democrats blaming everything under the Sun for her loss to Trump - other than the real reason that we have President Trump: the terminal case of corruption at the heart of the lying and cheating, primary-rigging, utterly useless and morally bankrupt Vichy-left leadership of the Democratic Party (Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Tim Kaine, Donna Brazile, etc.) that turned its back on the working class in favor of the corporate billionaire political donor class.

Chuck Schumer’s favored political strategy – to go after Republican voters instead of working class Democratic voters (why don’t you just run as a Republican then, Chuck?):
“For every blue-collar Democrat we will lose in western Pennsylvania, we will pick up two moderate Republicans in the suburbs in Philadelphia, and you can repeat that in Ohio and Illinois and Wisconsin.”

Nancy Pelosi after sweeping, historic Democratic losses at the federal, state and local levels:
“Well I don’t think that people want a new direction”:

With leaders like these, who needs enemies?

The only reason the Democrats are wiped out at every level of government is because the Democratic leadership has turned its back on the people in favor of their corporate donor-class overlords. Not because of Russia, or sexism, or Comey, or the weather.

I just had to say it, because the refusal of the Democratic Party to accept the real reason for their massive losses has gone on for way too long.
 
Last edited:



Top