Forum Super Hero
Short of reading 162 pages with extensive graphs, give me a summary of the points that you find most significant.
SUPPORT THE SHOW AND ENJOY A PREMIUM PARACAST EXPERIENCE! Welcome to The Paracast+, seven years young! For a low subscription fee, you can download the ad-free version of The Paracast and the exclusive, member-only, After The Paracast podcast, featuring color commentary, exclusive interviews, the continuation of interviews that began on the main episode of The Paracast. We also offer lifetime memberships! Flash! Use the coupon code ufo20 to receive a 20% discount on five-year or lifetime subscriptions. And PayPal now accepts cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin, in payment. We also offer a second payment method for major credit or debit cards (which also includes Apple Pay and Google Pay), so act now! It's easier than ever to susbcribe! You can sign up right here!
Once again, you also have to wonder why ET would be using 20th century technology in constructing spacecraft that may be capable of star travel? If they are hundreds or thousands of years ahead of us, wouldn't they have developed more advanced hull materials?
You know that for a fact, where did you get your information? Every story has some inaccurate info, Hangar 1 has a lot of verifiable evidence presented. Wake up all of you, Quit being so unrealistic and think everything is debunkableI'd forgotten about the impact of the change of channel, and will be interested to hear reviews from new viewers.
Supposedly millions more potential viewers!
The debut episode was in the same formula as last season, but they've changed up the cast a bit.
There's one new thing; the stories now each have fictional case file numbers.
You don't listen to well, You have your critical agenda and close your mind. Of course at least some of the information presented on hangar 1 is speculative, and what if true, etc, Drama to make the show more interesting. That does not make the whole show BS, Come on what show or some type of info is not debunkable, debateable? Opinions varyYour comparison is a but faulty but you have a point. The Paracast does promote some BS just by covering on the show, but it's not generally presented as anything but the guest's claims, and usually challenging questions are asked. The TV shows seldom provide any sort of balance, they just state the material as fact and support it with dramatic re-enactments of things that may have never happened.
Some of the TV shows open with a disclaimer stating that the material is speculative and ask the viewer to decide for himself. Instead of a disclaimer, "Hangar 1" opens with statements proclaiming the program is based on actual MUFON case files that they have investigated. That is false. Worse, they present stories from discredited sources, support them with phony graphics of newspapers and government documents, and have a professional actor playing the role of a UFO researcher to "sincerely" describe whatever case is in the script.
MUFON is starring in a reality TV show with very little reality in it. It could be worse, but it couldn't be much worse.
When you are in the middle of a modern myth being born it's reasonable to concede that there will be many tall tales of the Reptilian one that got away. Those edges of the myth will be mainstreamed and popularized through the common channels of the day. Television is just the worst of it and YouTube only exacerbates the problem.The critics of ufology don't even have to go after programs like Hangar 1. The History Channel has done all the heavy lifting themselves promoting dreck like this.