Search results

This is for those who can't see that Black Holes, as defined by astronomers/physicists do not exist. If you want a simple breakdown it's this: At the center of a Black Hole is believed to be a "singularity", a place of infinite density and zero volume. In fact there are only two main...

After Whitney Houston died on February 11, 2012, there was talk of it possibly being murder and then it quickly all went away. Before it went away a P.I. came forward and claimed he believed Whitney was murdered by her drug dealers over her drug debt which he estimated to be over a million...

No, Mike. I'm merely pointing out that science is not based on faith. Let's take a look at some of the alarmist's claims over the years: 1. Acid rain will destroy the world's forests and then plants and animals will all die out. 2. The world will overpopulated by the late 1970s and everyone...

Mike, Go back and watch those videos I posted from Donnna Lamframboise regarding her work to expose the IPCC. She found out lots of dirty secrets that they are relying on "scientists" in their early 20s and sometimes prior to them even getting their masters' yet. Not only that but they use...

No. I didn't quote him. The article did. And the article specifically stated that most scientists believe that the earth could support 9-10 billion people.

Yes. Because if both are only funding their chosen side then both are biased. If the US was funding scientists who both supported and opposed AGW then it would be different. Also, I'm not sure if you remember it or not but I mentioned several times now that the U.S. government has acted to...

No I didn't miss that. That's his opinion. It doesn't mean he's right. And not all land is used for livestock so I'm not sure he would try to word it as such. The majority of land is unused and he doesn't take into account human technological advancements.

No, Mike you are wrong. Overpopulation figures BOTH number of individuals and resources, not just resources. I've never argued here for just the number of people. I'm only trying to point out your ignoring of the number of people.

Uh-Oh, Mike's wrong. This link says that most scientist's believe the earth can safely support 10 billion people. There are currently 7 billion people now. This means the Earth is not overpopulated. Going further, the human population will peak shortly and then naturally decrease. How Many...

Finally! Mike, finally gives a figure, 2-3 billion. Now, I'm going to check around and research it and see if it's true or if it's not. FYI: Resources can be shipped globally. Just so you know.

Now you are arguing for hypocrisy, that it's bad when the Oil industry only funds anti-AGW research and good when the U.S. government only funds pro-AGW research.

Overpopulation is a function of the number of individuals compared to the relevant resources, such as the water and essential nutrients they need to survive. It can result from an increase in births, a decline in mortality rates, an increase in immigration, or an unsustainable biome and...

For the sake of argument, l'll accept this is true, that he is funded by the oil industry. So we should reject what he says. However, since what is good for the goose is also good for the gander, we should also reject every single scientist who receives government grants for pro-AGW research...

I read the link you provided. So the accusation against him is for showing favor to skeptics of AGW? Forgive me if I'm not shocked. You will need to explain why you believe this somehow proves the information I posted is wrong and also explain why in the pro-AGW field this should be accepted...

In science we don't address people, we address information. Whatever he is doing in his life is of no concern to me unless it can be demonstrated that he has falsified data or is being deceptive. We do have evidence that climate scientists have been deceptive. Everyone forgets about Climategate...

Trystero, I've already addressed this. I told you they are trying to come up with all manner of excuses to explain why temperature rises first. They are trying to attack mostly on two levels, saying that air bubbles in ice cores are fooling scientists into thinking that temperatures rose first...

Author and journalist, Donna Laframboise, exposes the UN's IPCC.

COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING MYTH 1: Global temperatures are rising at a rapid, unprecedented rate. FACT: The HadCRUT3 surface temperature index, produced by the Hadley Centre of the UK Met Office and the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia, shows warming to...

No Gene. I have not been trolling. I have been following the rules of this forum. I'm not the one making threats to people, Gene.

Mike didn't give me a figure. Instead, he went on and on about resources. That's not giving a figure. You should have no problem providing a figure representing the number of people the earth can safely support. Until you do so then you are simply making a proclamation, as in, "because you say so."