Search results

Yes we can move on but I must correct your above statement. The only evidence that you have examined and found to be fraudulent in your view are a few JPEGS. As some people would know, Marcel Vogel had a very different viewpoint on Meiers submitted metal samples. So when you say 'the evidence...

Indeed I have read Davids analysis and it seems he has done a fairly good job of checking it out. My specific point is that analysis of a low resolution JPEG cannot be taken seriously as proof or evidence either for or against. I do agree that the wedding cake pics are questionable as indeed so...

Yes my response to his points were..... analysis of a low resolution JPEG is not a photo analysis so therefore is not evidence. The crop of Meier Jpegs floating about on the internet are poor third hand copies at best and due to the nature of digital images represent no proof either way. Please...

This Thread is like sheep worshipping the herder...... I wonder how many people here have made a visit to Meier's farm and done their own research? Or even bothered to research all of the previous analysis done by plenty of other experts? It seems there still is a concerted effort to spread...

hmmm..... Maybe this Forum should be renamed The Meier/Horne Bashing Forum. I find it funny that people have made a point of Mr Horne being supposedly nasty in his exchanges almost as if he has some kind of split personality. Considering the time and effort Mr Horne has put into researching...