Recent content by Rob

Schuyler, since the thread topic was dealing with an issue that was brought up on the Bassett Disclosure episode, what I said was hardly out of place. That's a fair criticism to say that I didn't refer to other previous posts on a similar topic, but that's kinda irrelevant since my making...

Yeah, I'm probably guilty of kicking off the whole emotional aspect to this, mea culpa. I'm not really surprised or puzzled by the reactions, however.

Astroboy, I think you're confusing matters. The direct relevance I was referring to was the explanation for what it means for a thing, any object, to exist. I wasn't making any explicit connection between this and any of David's claims, either past, present or yet to come. This is a seperate...

Astroboy, I explicitly stated that this had nothing directly to do with Biedny's claims. My words: "I'm not sure of it's relevance here, and I'm not making any argument from that perspective that has any direct consequence to your claims". Gareth, doesn't what you said about no proof of any...

Chuckles, we define how something exists by comparing it to what it is not. For example, this keyboard I'm typing on has a form, it has an appearance. There are a certain number of individual elements that make up the keyboard; the keys, various electronic components, wires etc. The keyboard...

David, your emotionally charged outburts are robbing you of your reason. I don't claim to "have all the answers to life", I only said that I could explain what it means for something to exist. Hardly the same thing. The personal insults are noted, I'll be complaining to the relevant...

David, on the question and definition of existence, you're almost there. It's possible to make the argument that you neither exist nor not exist. The same goes with this asshole, everyone else, the universe itself and everything in it. Nothing ultimately exists. Things, people and objects only...

Clearly, I was interested in the subject of UFOs and other phenomenon of the sort since I first came to the Paracast forums, but after having spent time looking at the evidence presented here on the show and elsewhere, and through posing further questions about the nature of what that evidence...

Chuckle, the quality of a forum is determined by the quality of the posts, which are themselves dependant on the quality of the arguments made by the poster. I didn't say anything that hasn't been said before, and the fact that you react in this child-like manner is evidence that you haven't yet...

What I'm essentially say is this. Inherent and inescapable to the human mind is it's limitations in perception. We cannot think the unthinkable. Emprically, we have no way of being absolutely certain that the whole of existence as it appears to us isn't, for example, some kind of simulation...

Has Biedny ever had anything other than anecdotal evidence for ANY of his supposed experiences? His brother, a friend or two... ? He's laughing his ass off at the credulity of you folks here, don't you see this Jeezus H. "Revelation". Get over yourselves.

This review from The Amateur Scientist reflects my own opinion of The Paracast. The writer listens to a few episodes, then gives a reasoned critical analysis. It's not totally damning, yet not totally encouraging either. But it is fair.

20 minute audio interview with Robert Jacobs, taken from TopSecretTestimony.com (part of the Disclosure Project I think). Here The audio quality isn't great, some short silent breaks (I think the questions were edited out), but it's quite a compelling testimony. I honestly don't know what to...

I dunno for sure, but this one I do know happened : Q - "Which one revolves around the Earth?" (La Lune = Moon, correct answer) A - "The Sun" FAIL

You just found him? Stanhope is great. He's got a couple of cds and dvds out, check out Deadbeat Hero - fucking brilliant comedy. Check this bit on Abortion : <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1t2mMMp7bjU&hl=fr&fs=1"></param><param...