Don, its ludicrous this story and i personally don't believe one word of it. The fact Halt (the deputy commander of the base at the time of this event) was himself involved on the second night with his men, tells me, she's barking up the wrong tree on this. Just think of the importance of this man (Halt) would have been to the base at this time in 1980 and how logical is it, he would be totally unaware of a psychological operation been in motion at the base he co-runned? She is right on the money some of the Rendlesham witnesses don't always agree on what each other saw and witnessed (Fact) But (John and Jim) have for years it seems never been comfortable with Larry's account of a third night of experiences. Jim, also claims Larry has lied about parts of his life in the army and outside it, and about his time at the Bentwaters base and what he did there! Jim, also claims he knows Larry was being untruthful because he found many of these discrepancies in the book, Left at East Gate by Larry Warren, Peter Robbins: ... (That Jim claims and says can not be true because of his investigations, and him been there at the time to know these were false representations) "This is was Jim beliefs as far as i know it to date. When he touched the craft it allegedly downloaded a binary code message or messages into his conscious mind. He documented this in 1994 having got a binary code from the craft, but no details were given then what it meant back then and him having written this binary code down in his notebook on the 27th 1980.. Remember Jim only retired from Active duty in 1993- that's an important point to remember. Jim, believes there us from a future time and the binary messages when upon deciphering them seem to be showing location co-ordinates and other things not yet revealed by Jim and John to us the public. What it all means who knows maybe that June 2012 conference will tell us more or just confuse us more and cause some to doubt the case even further. Only time will tell on this and its not that far away now, to finally find out what all the fuss is about!! Jim, has responded to Sacha Christie claims, but this message in particular to a Facebook poster might answer some of the unanswered allegations made on that show by this lady. She was using this 244 page Defense Nuclear Agency program document to explain the RFI. I thought I set one of her supporters straight with this. I just happen to be very familure with the document and program she was trying to use. Posting below from Justice site. @Daniel. Dan, I am glad you like this document. This document is part of a testing program by the Defense Nuclear Agency. It was designed to test and understand effects from interior alarms within weapons storage structures, and the MAID MILES (Magnetic Anti-Intrusion Detection Line Sensor) magnetic line sensors surrounding WSAs, which also included FDS (Fence Disturbance System) which was attached to outer chain link fences on WSAs. . The study program was two-fold, one it had a concentration of prolong effects of physiological effects such as mental fatigue. It further looked at the line sensors; the Maid Miles could cause some other minor conditions if you were exposed to the magnetic field from the line sensor. Prolong exposure would have to be caused from directly standing within the very small area of influence. (The actual distant would be classified, but outside the immediate area of the WSA that is installed in would determine range. But rest assured it would be less than twenty feet... And two, the study and testing also observed and evaluated responses from SRTs (Security Alert Teams) and by ARTs (Alarm Response Teams), back up times, and effectiveness under fatigue situations was also evaluated under this study. I was a qualified SPCDS Operator and was certified in that position, I further wrote and developed all Security OPLANS, and Security Directives for the twin bases. It is important to know, that this testing was done stateside at Nellis AFB in the early 1980s for Sandia Labs. Testing of this sort was done entirely in the states for standardization purposes. The USAF never conducts testing outside the continental United States. Because of security reasons. It also studied time responses and back up of security teams and SPCDS Operator alarm Annunciations within the Shelter when this alarm was active. This program that you and Ronnie are referring too, once read in its entirety you will find, answers NOTHING I am afraid, because people are trying to re-write was it is intended for. It is simply a standardization and evaluation of a bigger security picture involving the type of systems used and response initiatives. In either case, to have any medical or physiological effect, you would have to live inside a structure for about five years to be effected or be camped outside for years trying to get a medical effect from this by-product of these alarm systems. An interesting fact is the study determined in .001 percent of the cases involving testing; it only created a slight medical condition. Very rare and remote. So I am not knocking theories Dan, I am only telling you that this program/study does not have anything to do with any Air Force Base which is located overseas. I do understand that bogus information like this detracts and can mislead people, and derail them from what really happened at RAF Bentwaters/Woodbridge. The answers are very simple, and we will see you in June.