Four flying bombs were captured on film and survived without alteration. The only inconsistency is chopper 4 disappears behind the top of tower 1, while the other three are lower but at the same level. Here they are in this order; NY1, WB11, CBS, and Chopper 4, aka WNBC. Only the CBS orb did not air live. The Today Show aired the orb but changed camera angles before it could complete its path to explosion. The final 14 seconds of approach by nist was south to north, not west to east. The drone/orb cannot visually be a chopper or plane and its float path would have crashed into the west side of T2, not southeast corner. The drone literally circled the towers just like Matt Lauer said after he saw it.
I had heard something of this a while back but I'd never seen this interview. Wow. He seems very sure and matter-of-fact in his timeline i.e that WT7 had explosions before either tower collapsed. Maybe I am more paranoid but if I had been him I would have started to panic when I realised I was one of only 2 people who could justifiably contradict the official story. Of course hindsight is a great thing. It is an utter travesty that the '9/11 commision' - and for that you may as well read 'warren commision' asked Barry, presumably under some oath about his experience and then neglect to include it in the official report. Any police officer would tell you that different witnesses can have vastly differing accounts of the same event and still all be all telling the truth as they saw it. So Barry's story does not have to match the official account for him to be telling the truth. No. It would be fine to have contradictory evidence to a degree. It is far from fine to just effectively delete his testimony from the record. That smacks of direction from above or at least housekeeping from investigators wishing to bring only evidence that backs the official story. Without evidence it may be a leap to jump to the conclusion his death is related but it seems very telling that a private investigator, charged with investigating his death, accepted the job then refused to continue. If TV characters are to be believed PI's are always broke and looking for a case to make some money. It would have to be a compelling reason for one not to proceed with an investigation. One major thing about the whole 9/11 thing that really bothers me is that if it was a conspiracy, then I would think such a conspiracy would try to rely on as few people being in the know as possible. Certainly I find it impossible to believe that the whole CIA or FBI is in on it. If that is the case, and I think it probably is, then there must be large swathes of public officials and law enforcement officers who are not in the conspiracy but must still be acting as if they are, i.e they do not know but regardless they are going to do anything to make sure the official story is the only one that is accepted. For example, if Barry was 'taken out' then I am sure the hitman would not have been involved in planning 9/11 but even so, is willing, on orders, to remove someone who is telling the truth, thereby confirming the official story is untrue to said hitman. Like he finds out it all stinks but jumps in and becomes part of it willingly. Sick beyond comprehension if true. The really sad part is that a hard-working family man in the wrong place at the wrong time will over time become a smaller and smaller part of peoples lives and in the end, probably it will seem like he never existed. Not in the nation's consciousness anyway. It is a good thing that he told his side when he had the chance and that will survive for ever. I mean really, what goes through Obama's mind if he watches testimony like that? Does he have any doubts? gordon
The inboard flap track on the right wing of fake 175 clearly has the inboard flap not between it and the fuselage (YOU can see it, clear as day), thus it's too close as the faked image shows. The left engine nacelle also does not connect to the underside of the wing at a point outboard of the flap track, exactly as it can't be. The rearmost point of the nacelle attachment footprint is clearly not abaft of the leading tip of the flap track fairing, also impossible and fake.
Quote: Originally Posted by V8rider Not only that, the two large reflections on the left engine would not be there given the angle of the plane and the shadow on the rest of the plane. I work with Photoshop every day and could do a much better job than that. The inboard flap track on the right wing of fake 175 clearly has the inboard flap not between it and the fuselage (YOU can see it, clear as day), thus it's too close as the faked image shows. The left engine nacelle also does not connect to the underside of the wing at a point outboard of the flap track, exactly as it can't be. The rearmost point of the nacelle attachment footprint is clearly not abaft of the leading tip of the flap track fairing, also impossible and fake. This floundering, fake image flop has the flap open on the front of the left wing, not rear where it must be. Yet, another devastating blow to the real planes myth. The hinged control surfaces are used to steer and control the airplane. The flaps and ailerons are connected to the backside of the wings. The flaps slide back and down to increase the surface of the wing area. They also tilt down to increase the curve of the wing. The slats move out from the front of the wings to make the wing space larger. This helps to increase the lifting force of the wing at slower speeds like takeoff and landing. The ailerons are hinged on the wings and move downward to push the air down and make the wing tilt up. This moves the plane to the side and helps it turn during flight. After landing, the spoilers are used like air brakes to reduce any remaining lift and slow down the airplane.
