Trained Observer, you have some excellent questions as usual. They're the same questions that pop into my small brain. Yes, Jack Ruby suddenly got cancer when he became a serious liability to the conspirators. Dorothy Kilgallen, amazingly, got access to Ruby (see
The Death of Dorothy Kilgallen) and received a certain amount of information from him. She later told friends that Ruby's story would blow the lid off a cover-up of the assassination. This kind of talk, we now know, will get you killed and on Nov. 8, 1965, she was found dead in her apartment. Very sad and very predictable.
The whole history of Ruby, Oswald, Judyth Vary Baker, David Ferrie, Guy Banister, Carlos Marcello, Dr. Mary Sherman (well shucks, Mary Sherman was working for people researching a cancer virus), and other shadowy figures in New Orleans (including CIA operatives) is a history that's been covered in numerous books. Bottom line: Ruby may have been one of the very first targets who was assassinated by weaponized cancer. Red Pill Junkie is right, too: polonium and other radioactive particles will kill you but aren't nearly as stealthy as a cancer virus. Yeah, it's a miracle that Castro is alive after repeated CIA kill attempts. He lived a careful life after the first attempt.
Now back to Karla Turner and other UFO researchers. Were they really murdered by deliberate infection with cancer? I don't know. I highly suspect, though, that it can be done. The words of Dr. Hynek should be remembered. Years after he left Project Blue Book he talked about the mission of Blue Book, the private internal mission. He said their mandate was to insure that the American public not become excited about the UFO subject; that sightings which could be easily explained, were . . . and events that could not be explained were classified and hidden from the public. Conversely, any persons who
did release sensational information about UFOs and
did excite the public (Frank Edwards) may have become targets.
By my estimate, it's very likely that Hynek and Schiff were assassinated, especially Schiff. He was becoming a royal pain to the "silence group," whoever they are. Was there a motive to also eliminate Karla Turner? That's very hard to say. Some people speculate the CIA is delighted when "Grays and abductions" are the focus of attention and the UFO issue is publicly perceived as a silly fantasy. Researcher Joseph Farrell has a few things to say about all this in his new book,
Saucers, Swastikas and Psyops. On the other hand, through her persistence, Turner violated Rule No. 1: Do not excite the public about UFOs.
Another general observation: As some researchers--or government whistleblowers--get close to the truth, too close for comfort, they receive a warning. The warning can come by different means but it is an unmistakable warning. Those who heed the warning and back off can lead a normal life. Those who ignore the warning . . . will always be looking over their shoulder. Some will die prematurely in an unexpected way.
"What is the truth that cannot be told?" From the viewpoint of the silence group, it may be a little simpler than that. I think their mantra is, "Scientists, educators and other professionals: do not research the UFO subject. It will damage your career." As we've seen in the past, it may also end your life.
Have things changed in the last decade? Is instant Internet access to information and video frustrating the silence group? Is disclosure "happening every day," as Edgar Mitchell would say? I think so. Now, finally, there are too many voices to silence. Even the former Governor of Arizona says he witnessed the giant boomerang that flew over Phoenix in 1997. With a DSL wire attached to the back of our PC, we have the power to change minds around the world in real time. Viva la Paracast.