See, my problem with the entire theory that this is best explained as a case of E.T. is that we place all too much emphasis on human based comparison and human based physical need. What states in the record that E.T. actually sees the same way we humanoids do, therefore he needs "lights" on in darkness, and thus lights on his craft? Why is it that we take for granted that E.T. must use a metallic like structure to reach us in? With the advanced intelligence of this supposed space faring people, why not a "biological" chemical hybrid of some sort which layered outer shell would adapt to any conditions and changes in both atmosphere and environment
Well I do have an opinion the lights on the UFO's must serve some purpose, it still very much unknown, to what the true overall purpose of these coloured lights been on would be. Your been persistent with your opinion, that the reason why people are seeing these lights on UFO's is because this is what humans would undoubtedly expect to see, mosty likely, but this expectation is not at the end of the day, been determined or controlled by the observer is it. That would be the opinion I have at the moment. The devices in the skies do very much appear to be real and, be controlled by pilots of perhaps a nonhuman origin and, the lights on the UFO's, the basic function is to see at at night and maybe identify their presence to other human air-traffic in their vicinity.
We don't also don't take it for granted "ET" would use metallic structures to get here from wherever and, I personally very much open to other suggestions from anyone, has to how one could travel the vast distances of space to one point A to another point called B without using a spacecraft.
The Stark reality is though that space has no atmosphere, so you can't very much walk, from one planet to another unless and, this to me is a very much a journey of wild fantasy, that there is beings out there in the universe somewhere, that have unique superpowers like the fictional character Superman. I like to stick to what we do know, and don't know. A Cybernetic lifeform-machine manufactured by a nonhuman species, for the purpose of planet exploration, again I would expect here definitely a realistic assumption to me, a Cybernetic machine lifeform, would require a mode or device to travel in, plus human science clearly outlines the pitfalls of travelling to other planets and stars systems, so a protective shield or coating would be needed to protect the spaceship from those harsh realties/ like radiation, and not having the right propulsion engine nonHumans will not get very far from their home world.
But let us take go back to what we know about UFO's. Many Objects of a strange shape do show up lot in Photographs and Videos and, these objects don't operate in ways one would expect craft would act and handle, if build by human hands, as well, a Hallucination is were one would have an unnormal experience, that would seem real to the person having the experience and, if one went about trying to touch, whatever this hallucination was, you'd would undoubtedly be unable to do so, as this hallucination is a projection from the mind and, is non existent in the literal sense.
Thousands of individuals from all types of ethnic cultures have seen UFO's for centuries and so forth. Yet know explanation as ever been given from science, as to how a mass UFO hallucination, would take place over many centuries, if not thousands of years and, how one would explain objects of unknown design showing up on our planets radar defence systems, and fighter aircraft been scrambled to intercept these objects (a reality) ,and sometimes it has been reported fighter jets, have locked on to a solid and flying object of unknown origin.
Look meteors don't slow down to a standstill, and move at different left and right angles, and UFO hallucinations, show never ever show up on countless videos, and photographs. It so far from prosaic that it is frightening to me skeptics do not see an issue with this at all. Please do continue with your unrealistic approach to this phenomenon, but I live life based on commonsense approach, as it only takes one good UFO case to confirm visitation from nonHumans and, Paul Kimball "Best Evidence" details in depth ten UFO cases and, all yet to be unexplained with any new information.
There cases in the video were weird odd of place far from normal sightings of unusual and weird crafts have been seen by credible people, with reliable professionals backgrounds and careers. I would say there is another ten or dozen more UFO cases that could have made the grade. But look go away and come back to me with explanation, to all ten sightings Paul has in his video then we can talk. Look I don't want to make this a personal issue, but facts are facts, the video is showing real experiences with real people. Do I believe the evidence, yes I do, seems you don't, but that is your personal choice, but just because I belief this subject is real, does not make me stupid and unwise.
I have had real honest experiences with UFO's and in my opinion this technology was not belonging to any nation on this planet (one of my sightings I add was documented in my country this informations exist and can be found on the on the internet) and, you disbelieving. I have frankly really does not effect the reality, that I have had these unique experiences for real. If you'd had believed me like, that is what I would fine a bit odd, as you know next to nothing about me, other than I respond to your paranormal postings often on the internet!
The Grays do indeed look very similar to today's humans, and if you think about it, a hundred thousand or so years into the future, with science advancing the way it is, we probably wouldn't have as much need for muscles and larger frames, as we would do much less physical tasks. We would probably develop a higher sense of telekinetic awareness and thus no need for verbal communication, so you would probably see smaller mouths. Our eyes would better be adapted with elongated corneas, as this would make it better to see in the darkness of space. For the "futurists" amongst us, this fits nicely
If you don't believe in such silly nonsense that ET or Time Travellers exist. Why do you disagree with my theory about "Greys there is a contradiction in your belief there I think? There is a also contradiction in your belief, the gray looks like me, and you and everyone, as you don't believe in the reality of any of this. To me a believer in such UFO nonsense (a bad word laugh) the gray does not look like a human, don't see the family resemblance to be honest, but if it floats the boat of futurists or you, that is fine by me, who am I to argue with peoples visions for humanity in the far future.
It is an open-minded exercise to have. But look Homo-sapiens had similar features to the physical appearance- features we have now, slightly more body and facial hair, but the theory is Homo-sapiens came out of Africa, around 220,000 years ago, and some Anthropology experts, do argue for a longer date for migration, then the scientific mainstream accepted "Out of Africa" theory, but anyways another Skull discovery may change all, but essentially we have always had a strong build with muscles and, frankly don't see how science in the future could radically change our look so much to look like a Gray.
When humans lose too much of their body mass we do get ill. Humans organs need a certain amount of body fat and muscle to function, and when we eat food, for pleasure, still the purpose of food is to keep us healthy and build strength. The internal organs, the Gray has if any, if even a being even exists like this, is still unknown. How we would metamorphosis so much to have such a weak body, and change skin colour from white to gray blue whatever color in the spectrum and, so on has me bambozzled.
Well we talk to ourselves all the time now without opening our mouth and speaking, the question is, in the future could other people hear you in their minds and you hear them.. We might have the reciever I think in our brain already, but how we dial out to another sentient being for communication. I really have no answer to that cool question[/QUOTE]
I for one do not believe it is our own human species visiting the past, nor do I believe it is E.T., as I have mentioned many times before here that I don't think E.T. would give two Shi's about our primitive ways or lives.
My point is that it's all to easy for today's investigators to corner the market on explanations due to the limits of what we understand as science, and this based on only as far out as our scientists have gotten us. If you are looking at an advanced race which can travel the way they do, and do so almost seamlessly, then it would be a very big mistake to rule out "magic" as a viable circumstance for an otherwise unbelievable tendency.
Lastly, mass illusion without drugs is a very viable and definitely possible happenstance. I remember years ago one of the magicians in Las Vegas was able to make an F14 Tomcat disappear right in front of the MGM Grand. He did this with everyone standing all around the stage, with no mirrors and no trap doors.
I also remember World War Two and the preamble to the Invasion of Normandy. General Patton was made the Commander of a dummy army which actually had blown up rubber tanks and transports all along the coast pointed at the Pas- De-Calais. The illusion worked perfectly alongside Hitler's paranoia, and thus many Panzer Gruppens were diverted elsewhere.
Neither of these fetes were done with drugs or drug inducement of any kind, and both of them were illusions completed on a grand scale.
Therefore I feel that a "military" or covert govt. test situation can be just as good an explanation in this or any circumstance to E.T. or even E.D. for that matter. As was mentioned here a thousand times before, the U.S. Government isn't immune to using just this sort of method to test the resilience of its military personnel, or even civilian population
Your two examples are not great utmost your dealing with illusions that have been maximumed to their potential by human beings to fool other human beings. Comparing American soldier dolls and dummies and circus tricks to what the servicemen on a Nato- American and British witnessed is showing, an non pragmatic approach from you to the issues.
While your examples seem adequate to you. Your examples don't address why men with years of real hard military experience to their name, would start seeing strange things, that were beyond their control. The deputy base commander Col.Halt, himself was a skeptic, to what his men saw on the very first night of these sightings, he thought it all could be explained. When the UFO's came back, on the second night he witnessed this stuff himself and, he then became a believer in what his men had claimed the first night.
It is your prerogative to belief the United States Government, has a habit of drugging soldiers who's duty, it was to guard sensitive nuclear weapons on a foreign soil, or that some experimental test to see the reactions, of the US army to usual events happened at Rendlesam. But what evidence have you? Plus you have to include C. Halt been messed with too, as he too witnessed these objects in the sky on the second night.
The sad thing for you is even Skeptics to this case have been smart enough to realise this is idiotic explanation, but then again lot of Skeptics, aren't that bright really, as their favourite theory to explain Rendlesam is the lighthouse.
Fooled twice over two separate nights by the lighthouse Hmmm... Some UFO facts.
In 1956 Bentwater RAF-base had sightings of usual objects near the base. It well-documented event for those, who are interested in this, you will find that information on the internet. On December 26 1980-- objects appeared on the radar at radar station in East Anglia, and a RAF jet was scrambled to intercept, but the objects flew off when the RAF Jet approached the objects.
The pilot of the RAF- jet radioed back he could not keep up with these objects, and that he lost them.
There is strong more than average chance the events at Rendlesam, and the events at East Anglia RAF radar station, had some connection to each other. In my humble opinion also humans don't have the advanced machinery- technology to display, that so confused, the servicemen at Rendlesam in 1980. While I might believe there is something to the Bob Lazar story.
I still aint convinced there is evidence that he back-engineered Alien spacecraft at place called S4 for the United States Government. But for me I believe at least speculate a government role in his telling of story, and, I truly believe Lazar has had some connection/ be it as employee/ of one of US intelligence agencies. It speculation, but there is many things in his story, that he could not have pulled off by himself been a lone figure telling a lie.
I don't believe in crashed alien spaceships. Roswell is an real interesting story, but it has lot of holes in it for me. So how the United States, would have have got their hands, on the technology that was seen at Rendlesam is beyond me. While your country might be ten to fifteen years ahead of everyone else with military-technology to the rest of the world. It really is a monumental leap to believe, the United states pulled this off, I think the superiority of the United States in military-hardware does exist, but my opinion is the United States government has not got a mile long triangle ship in a hanger somewhere or even mini ones, and definately don't have devices in a orb- ball shape that can outpace modern Jet fighters and airplanes. The only thing left is that this planet is been visited by some intelligence not of this planet.
Who said ET cares for what we do, the evidence in my opinion suggests a neutral position. They only get involved with us unless it suits them.
