Recent content by ufojoe

After reading The Mysterious Valley, (TMV) I don't see how anybody cannot come to the conclusion that Chris is one of the best investigator's in the field today. That book is a must read for anybody interested in anomalous phenomena. He avoids coming to any conclusions and is clear when he is...

Nancy will be on the Jeff Rense show tonight at 11pm EST. You can listen online for free at: http://www.rense.com It will replay at 2am EST.

I think both sides should bury the hatchet (if one exists) and Nancy should continue to do what she has been doing: getting other experts involved in the Robbert case. That's the 100% right thing to do. And she should continue to over the Holland (as funds permit) once or twice a year and she...

In between gigs, (tv shows) I Have No Life! So, I guess I have more time to delve into some of these cases. Plus, I've had an interest in this case since the beginning. I get it and appreciate the reply. I know Nancy's contact info. is on her website so if anybody really wants to know more...

Damn it. I told my mom to destroy that photo!

Sigh... Excuse me for being a native New Yorker but, hell, maybe you guys should have done some research into the Robbert case before the show so these issues could have been addressed directly to Nancy. Seems like you were unprepared for that interview. I know the situation you are referring...

SR2, if you don't think she is a fraud, how do you explain her eyewitness account of a crop circle forming? Did Robbert go out and buy massive equipment to create the illusion? I know I keep harping on that piece of anecdotal evidence but to me, it's a big one.

Yes! If they had done some reading about the Robbert case beforehand, Nancy could have addressed each "criticism" or alleged cases of fraud, one by one. I wrote her privately and asked her about a few of those and she took the time to write back and explained some of them. Look for the next...

Yes, I know that. And I was referring to the poster who said he wouldn't waste his time looking at the rest of the photos on the BLT site related to Robbert. You really should read her work and not just go by what she says on the show(s). And it's not just a report. It's a report by somebody...

In other words... Don't bother me with the facts, my mind is made up. Thanks to Stanton Friedman. Granted, some of the more important evidence is anecdotal but how do you explain the crop circle forming in front of Nancy's eyes? She wrote up an excellent (free) report when it happened and...

LOL. I've read the entire thread. Should I write that in caps? Gotta love it. Read my posts and then try commenting again. I think something is going on BUT I support independent researchers (like Roll) investigating this case to know for sure. Anybody who is against that needs to ask...

http://www.imaging-resource.com/EVENTS/PMAS03/1046673348.html But she was probably talking about an LCD screen.

David said no such thing. He said that a few of the orb photos were dust. What he DID say is that some of the photos look like a light source was shining into the camera. And Nancy said she was there and there as no light source. You need to listen better. I've looked at every photo. Some of...

The (deceased?) people that supposedly have started to show up on camera are what really interests me. I hope a lot of these photos are posted in Nancy's next update. And I really hope that David reconsiders Nancy's request for him to analyze some of these photos. I've seen some of Robbert's...

Yep. Old news. I think it was on a TLC show about the Phoenix Lights. Way back when. Jim D. is the kind of guy that the UFO/Paranormal field needs more of.